Narration and discourse in the clinical dialogue

Why, what and how do we treat the linguistic aspects of idiographic science? What is the theoretical and methodological status of language within idiographic science? Our contribute move from the perspective of clinical psychology, a perspective that try to connect theoretical principles with an intervention praxis. Starting point of every clinical knowledge is a singularity, but it's important to explain that for singularity we don't mean a single individual, but a single actual case, a client-system (a group, a family, a community, a person) that by asking the intervention of the psychologist constitute itself as an unit. As clinical psychologist we are interested to the single case as part of a general category of cases, cases with characteristics that can be gradually identified and classified, at the same time I think that today ideographic science let us accept the challenge of finding methodological criterion to understand how psychological phenomenon which interest the psychologist are strictly interdependent with the contextual dynamics that generated the intervention request. This logic is based on the principle that the relationship between the dynamics of the psychological process and the occurrences of this dynamics as phenomenon is always and however mediated by a contextual condition.