I don’t know the answer to that question. A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of White House Press Briefings

White House Press Briefings, daily meetings with the press held by the White House Press Secretary (the podium), are the main information conduit for the White House (Kumar 2007). They are considered a “political chess game” where the two main participants, the podium and the press face a “wrestling match” (Partington 2006: 16). Our analysis is carried out on a corpus comprising all the Press Briefings across three presidencies from Clinton to Obama (January 1993 – May 2011). The additional mark-up includes information about individual speakers and their role, allowing us to compare different discourse strategies adopted by the participants in the briefings at different points in time. This leads us to determine the extent of the differences in the patterns found as well as the nature of the variation from one participant to the next one. Starting from a phraseological perspective (Granger and Meunier 2008), our analysis will focus on avoidance strategies enacted by the podium with the main purpose of preserving face and yet “doing the job” (Partington 2003: 80). We will show how different phraseological units (I don’t know, I’m not aware, I don’t believe) are exploited by various podiums over an 18-year span, mainly in accordance with strategic communication choices made by the US administrations. The analysis will highlight differences in the podium’s attitude towards the press with particular reference to the first George W. Bush’ presidency.