The presentation concerns Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2014/104/UE which create a “microsystem” of the law of the evidences. Then, it focuses on the disclosure of leniency statements and settlement submissions, by analysing the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union before and after the entry into force of the Directive. It will be found out that while the Court has always been cautious, by affirming that it is necessary to weigh up, on a case-by-case basis, the respective interests in favour of disclosure of such documents and those in favour of their protection, the European Legislator preferred to unconditionally protect the efficiency of leniency and settlement programmes to the detriment of parties that suffered a harm, which have to find any possible way to support their damage claim in a context in which the information asymmetry and the difficulty of the factual and economic analysis are evident.
The Disclosure of Evidence under the Antitrust Damages Directive 2014/104/EU / Massa, Claudia. - (2017). (Intervento presentato al convegno 7th International PhD Students’ Conference on Competition Law tenutosi a University of Białystok, Poland nel 10/10/2017).
The Disclosure of Evidence under the Antitrust Damages Directive 2014/104/EU
Claudia Massa
2017
Abstract
The presentation concerns Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2014/104/UE which create a “microsystem” of the law of the evidences. Then, it focuses on the disclosure of leniency statements and settlement submissions, by analysing the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union before and after the entry into force of the Directive. It will be found out that while the Court has always been cautious, by affirming that it is necessary to weigh up, on a case-by-case basis, the respective interests in favour of disclosure of such documents and those in favour of their protection, the European Legislator preferred to unconditionally protect the efficiency of leniency and settlement programmes to the detriment of parties that suffered a harm, which have to find any possible way to support their damage claim in a context in which the information asymmetry and the difficulty of the factual and economic analysis are evident.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
27. Relazione Bialystok 10.10.2017.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
358.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
358.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.