The presentation addresses the issue of how how the Italian tax and transfer system affected income poverty from 2006 to 2018. By using cross-sectional survey data from the Italian EU-SILC (Europe-an Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions) and developing some ad hoc synthetic indices, the research is methodologically based on comparing the actual and a hypothetical situation. In the former, identified as 'full government involvement', the tax and transfer system affects the amount of equivalised disposable income; in contrast, in the latter, iden-tified as 'limited government involvement', the equivalised disposable income corresponds to market income. Evidence was found of the ineffectiveness of the tax and transfer system. The negative impact, as compared to the non-involvement situation, is quantified as fol-lows: for every person who benefitted from it and became non-poor, at least one or more people were negatively affected and became poor. As a result, the overall population of the poor in the actual situation has always been larger than that in the hypothetical scenario; nevertheless, despite the fiscal consolidation implemented by the Italian government, this distortion has gradually narrowed over time. Finally, according to the poverty indicators from the Foster, Greer, and Thorbecke class, the tax and transfer system also modified the income distribution of poor persons by raising the average and lowering the variance of their disposable income. This beneficial impact has become stronger in recent years.

The Contribution of the Tax and Transfers System to Poverty in Italy / Purificato, Francesco. - (2023). (Intervento presentato al convegno II WORKSHOP ITALIA - BRASILE: DEBATES ON NEW ECONOMY tenutosi a Online: Zoom nel 23-24 novembre 2023).

The Contribution of the Tax and Transfers System to Poverty in Italy

francesco purificato
2023

Abstract

The presentation addresses the issue of how how the Italian tax and transfer system affected income poverty from 2006 to 2018. By using cross-sectional survey data from the Italian EU-SILC (Europe-an Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions) and developing some ad hoc synthetic indices, the research is methodologically based on comparing the actual and a hypothetical situation. In the former, identified as 'full government involvement', the tax and transfer system affects the amount of equivalised disposable income; in contrast, in the latter, iden-tified as 'limited government involvement', the equivalised disposable income corresponds to market income. Evidence was found of the ineffectiveness of the tax and transfer system. The negative impact, as compared to the non-involvement situation, is quantified as fol-lows: for every person who benefitted from it and became non-poor, at least one or more people were negatively affected and became poor. As a result, the overall population of the poor in the actual situation has always been larger than that in the hypothetical scenario; nevertheless, despite the fiscal consolidation implemented by the Italian government, this distortion has gradually narrowed over time. Finally, according to the poverty indicators from the Foster, Greer, and Thorbecke class, the tax and transfer system also modified the income distribution of poor persons by raising the average and lowering the variance of their disposable income. This beneficial impact has become stronger in recent years.
2023
The Contribution of the Tax and Transfers System to Poverty in Italy / Purificato, Francesco. - (2023). (Intervento presentato al convegno II WORKSHOP ITALIA - BRASILE: DEBATES ON NEW ECONOMY tenutosi a Online: Zoom nel 23-24 novembre 2023).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/956565
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact