We outline the most significant features of a research conducted in the last years within three National Research Projects. First, we will discuss some shared, strategic research-choices and guidelines, validated by research results. Then, by a bottom-up approach, we will focus our attention on problems related to long-term Physics’ curricular planning and to a correlated schematic Standards’ definition. We propose to structure the phenomenological side of the curriculum according to eight content areas. Some structuring concepts and processes are made explicit as teaching/learning strategies (corresponding to ways of thinking, ways to look-at, modes of action, ways to talk about, etc). Such “universal categorisation tools” should be introduced from the very beginning of the talking-about and of the acting-on aspects of the physical world, and progressively explicated, formalised, reciprocally structured. Several levels of giving shape to (formalising) physical phenomena should thus become gradually accessible, keeping in mind that all the ones up to a given level are actually necessary for meaningful understanding.

A RESEARCH ON THE CONCEPTUAL ORGANISATION OF PHYSICS CURRICULUM AND STANDARDS / Balzano, Emilio; DE AMBROSIS, A; Gagliardi, M; Giordano, E; Guidoni, P; Mendella, G; Rinaudo, G; Stefanel, L; Tarsitani, C.. - STAMPA. - (2005), pp. 107-115. (Intervento presentato al convegno What Physics Should We Teach? tenutosi a Durban - Sud Africa nel 5-8 luglio 2004).

A RESEARCH ON THE CONCEPTUAL ORGANISATION OF PHYSICS CURRICULUM AND STANDARDS.

BALZANO, EMILIO;
2005

Abstract

We outline the most significant features of a research conducted in the last years within three National Research Projects. First, we will discuss some shared, strategic research-choices and guidelines, validated by research results. Then, by a bottom-up approach, we will focus our attention on problems related to long-term Physics’ curricular planning and to a correlated schematic Standards’ definition. We propose to structure the phenomenological side of the curriculum according to eight content areas. Some structuring concepts and processes are made explicit as teaching/learning strategies (corresponding to ways of thinking, ways to look-at, modes of action, ways to talk about, etc). Such “universal categorisation tools” should be introduced from the very beginning of the talking-about and of the acting-on aspects of the physical world, and progressively explicated, formalised, reciprocally structured. Several levels of giving shape to (formalising) physical phenomena should thus become gradually accessible, keeping in mind that all the ones up to a given level are actually necessary for meaningful understanding.
2005
1868883590
A RESEARCH ON THE CONCEPTUAL ORGANISATION OF PHYSICS CURRICULUM AND STANDARDS / Balzano, Emilio; DE AMBROSIS, A; Gagliardi, M; Giordano, E; Guidoni, P; Mendella, G; Rinaudo, G; Stefanel, L; Tarsitani, C.. - STAMPA. - (2005), pp. 107-115. (Intervento presentato al convegno What Physics Should We Teach? tenutosi a Durban - Sud Africa nel 5-8 luglio 2004).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Research.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.39 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.39 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/447271
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact