We compare the computational performance of the Fast Marching Method, the Fast Sweeping Method and of the Fast Iterative Method to determine a numerical solution to the eikonal equation. We point out how the FIM outperforms the other two thanks to its parallel processing capabilities.

A comparison of Fast Marching, Fast Sweeping and Fast Iterative Methods for the solution of the eikonal equation / Capozzoli, Amedeo; Curcio, Claudio; Liseno, Angelo; S., Savarese. - (2013), pp. 685-688. (Intervento presentato al convegno Telecommunications Forum tenutosi a Belgrado nel 26-28 Novembre 2013) [10.1109/TELFOR.2013.6716321].

A comparison of Fast Marching, Fast Sweeping and Fast Iterative Methods for the solution of the eikonal equation

CAPOZZOLI, AMEDEO;CURCIO, CLAUDIO;LISENO, ANGELO;
2013

Abstract

We compare the computational performance of the Fast Marching Method, the Fast Sweeping Method and of the Fast Iterative Method to determine a numerical solution to the eikonal equation. We point out how the FIM outperforms the other two thanks to its parallel processing capabilities.
2013
9781479914197
A comparison of Fast Marching, Fast Sweeping and Fast Iterative Methods for the solution of the eikonal equation / Capozzoli, Amedeo; Curcio, Claudio; Liseno, Angelo; S., Savarese. - (2013), pp. 685-688. (Intervento presentato al convegno Telecommunications Forum tenutosi a Belgrado nel 26-28 Novembre 2013) [10.1109/TELFOR.2013.6716321].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/575498
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact