In this paper, we address complexity issues for timeline-based planning over dense temporal domains. The planning problem is modeled by means of a set of independent, but interacting, components, each one represented by a number of state variables, whose behavior over time (timelines) is governed by a set of temporal constraints (synchronization rules). While the temporal domain is usually assumed to be discrete, here we consider the dense case. Dense timeline-based planning has been recently shown to be undecidable in the general case; decidability (NP-completeness) can be recovered by restricting to purely existential synchronization rules (trigger-less rules). In this paper, we investigate the unexplored area of intermediate cases in between these two extremes. We first show that decidability and non-primitive recursive hardness can be proved by admitting synchronization rules with a trigger, but forcing them to suitably check constraints only in the future with respect to the trigger (future simple rules). More "tractable" results can be obtained by additionally constraining the form of intervals in future simple rules: EXPSPACE-completeness is guaranteed by avoiding singular intervals, PSPACE-completeness by admitting only intervals of the forms [0, a] and [b, +∞[.
Complexity of timeline-based planning over dense temporal domains: Exploring the middle ground / Bozzelli, Laura; Peron, Adriano; Molinari, Alberto; Montanari, Angelo. - In: ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE. - ISSN 2075-2180. - 277:(2018), pp. 191-205. (Intervento presentato al convegno 9th International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics, and Formal Verification, G and ALF 2018 tenutosi a deu nel 2018) [10.4204/EPTCS.277.14].
Complexity of timeline-based planning over dense temporal domains: Exploring the middle ground
Bozzelli, Laura
;Peron, Adriano
;Montanari, Angelo
2018
Abstract
In this paper, we address complexity issues for timeline-based planning over dense temporal domains. The planning problem is modeled by means of a set of independent, but interacting, components, each one represented by a number of state variables, whose behavior over time (timelines) is governed by a set of temporal constraints (synchronization rules). While the temporal domain is usually assumed to be discrete, here we consider the dense case. Dense timeline-based planning has been recently shown to be undecidable in the general case; decidability (NP-completeness) can be recovered by restricting to purely existential synchronization rules (trigger-less rules). In this paper, we investigate the unexplored area of intermediate cases in between these two extremes. We first show that decidability and non-primitive recursive hardness can be proved by admitting synchronization rules with a trigger, but forcing them to suitably check constraints only in the future with respect to the trigger (future simple rules). More "tractable" results can be obtained by additionally constraining the form of intervals in future simple rules: EXPSPACE-completeness is guaranteed by avoiding singular intervals, PSPACE-completeness by admitting only intervals of the forms [0, a] and [b, +∞[.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
GandALF18.14.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
349.74 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
349.74 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.