In this paper, multidisciplinary design optimization within the AGILE European project is applied to two turboprop aircraft. The first one is a conventional configuration characterized by wing mounted engines, while the second one is an innovative configuration with rear engines installation on the horizontal tail tip with an innovative power plant architecture. Both configurations are suited for 90 passengers, a design range of 1200 nautical miles and a cruise Mach number equal to 0.56. The methodologies used to analyze both configurations include aerodynamic performance in clean, landing and takeoff configurations, mission performance, weight and balance, stability and control, emissions, in terms of Global Warming Potential parameter, and Direct Operating Cost estimation. The latest two will be considered as objective functions for the optimization loop. Aim of this paper is to compare both configurations highlighting benefits and limits. Particular attention has been posed on the innovative approach used to analyze the use cases. The whole design process is made up ofdifferent tools belonging to a specific partner. Each partner is specialized in a specific discipline. The design process has been setup to be completely automated so that, partners, distributed worldwide are able to communicate and exchange results through remote connection. In this way each discipline has been assigned to the suited specialist.
MDO applications to conventional and novel turboprop aircraft within agile European project / Stingo, Luca; Della Vecchia, Pierluigi; Cerino, Giovanni; Nicolosi, Fabrizio; De Marco, Agostino. - (2018), pp. 1-10. (Intervento presentato al convegno 31st Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS 2018 tenutosi a bra nel 2018).
MDO applications to conventional and novel turboprop aircraft within agile European project
Stingo, LucaWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;Della Vecchia, Pierluigi
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Nicolosi, FabrizioWriting – Review & Editing
;De Marco, AgostinoWriting – Review & Editing
2018
Abstract
In this paper, multidisciplinary design optimization within the AGILE European project is applied to two turboprop aircraft. The first one is a conventional configuration characterized by wing mounted engines, while the second one is an innovative configuration with rear engines installation on the horizontal tail tip with an innovative power plant architecture. Both configurations are suited for 90 passengers, a design range of 1200 nautical miles and a cruise Mach number equal to 0.56. The methodologies used to analyze both configurations include aerodynamic performance in clean, landing and takeoff configurations, mission performance, weight and balance, stability and control, emissions, in terms of Global Warming Potential parameter, and Direct Operating Cost estimation. The latest two will be considered as objective functions for the optimization loop. Aim of this paper is to compare both configurations highlighting benefits and limits. Particular attention has been posed on the innovative approach used to analyze the use cases. The whole design process is made up ofdifferent tools belonging to a specific partner. Each partner is specialized in a specific discipline. The design process has been setup to be completely automated so that, partners, distributed worldwide are able to communicate and exchange results through remote connection. In this way each discipline has been assigned to the suited specialist.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ICAS_2018_0648_TP_UNINA.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Full-Paper
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
629.8 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
629.8 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.