Background: Constricted maxilla is frequently associated with reduced nasal airway dimensions. Wheatear skeletal maxillary expansion (ME) is effective on the dimension of the upper airways is still a debated issue Objectives: This overview aimed to report the evidence provided by systematic reviews (SRs) on the effect of ME on the upper airways, and to assess the methodological quality of the included SRs. Methods: Six electronic databases have been explored up to November 2017. After title and abstract screening, SRs addressing the effects of fixed palatal expanders on the dimension and function of the nasal airways were included. The methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed using the updated version of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review (AMSTAR-2). Results: Eight SRs were included. The methodological quality of most of the included SRs ranged between low and critically low.One SR was rated of high quality. A significant increase of nasal linear dimensions was reported both in the short- and long-term, but supported by low/critically low quality SRs. The significant increase of nasal cavity volume was the only outcome supported by a high quality SR. Controversial results were found with regards to nasal function. Conclusion: Whenever a constricted maxilla is present general dentists, pediatricians and ENTs should be familiar with the potential improvement provided by ME. However, due to the low/critically low quality of SRs supporting these results, ME cannot be indicated only for upper airways enhancement, but should be supported by an orthodontic indication.

Effects of maxillary expansion on the upper airways: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses / Bucci, R.; Montanaro, D.; Rongo, R.; Valletta, R.; Michelotti, A.; D'Anto, V.. - In: JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION. - ISSN 0305-182X. - 46:4(2019), pp. 377-387. [10.1111/joor.12766]

Effects of maxillary expansion on the upper airways: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Bucci R.;Rongo R.;Valletta R.;Michelotti A.;D'Anto V.
2019

Abstract

Background: Constricted maxilla is frequently associated with reduced nasal airway dimensions. Wheatear skeletal maxillary expansion (ME) is effective on the dimension of the upper airways is still a debated issue Objectives: This overview aimed to report the evidence provided by systematic reviews (SRs) on the effect of ME on the upper airways, and to assess the methodological quality of the included SRs. Methods: Six electronic databases have been explored up to November 2017. After title and abstract screening, SRs addressing the effects of fixed palatal expanders on the dimension and function of the nasal airways were included. The methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed using the updated version of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review (AMSTAR-2). Results: Eight SRs were included. The methodological quality of most of the included SRs ranged between low and critically low.One SR was rated of high quality. A significant increase of nasal linear dimensions was reported both in the short- and long-term, but supported by low/critically low quality SRs. The significant increase of nasal cavity volume was the only outcome supported by a high quality SR. Controversial results were found with regards to nasal function. Conclusion: Whenever a constricted maxilla is present general dentists, pediatricians and ENTs should be familiar with the potential improvement provided by ME. However, due to the low/critically low quality of SRs supporting these results, ME cannot be indicated only for upper airways enhancement, but should be supported by an orthodontic indication.
2019
Effects of maxillary expansion on the upper airways: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses / Bucci, R.; Montanaro, D.; Rongo, R.; Valletta, R.; Michelotti, A.; D'Anto, V.. - In: JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION. - ISSN 0305-182X. - 46:4(2019), pp. 377-387. [10.1111/joor.12766]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/756122
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact