The publisher regrets that there is an error in the title of this article. The title should be read as: “Biparametric 3t magnetic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: A further improvement of PI-RADS v2?” Instead of: “Biparametric 3t magentic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: A further improvement of PI-RADS v2?” The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Erratum to “Biparametric 3t magnetic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: A further improvement of PI-RADS v2? [Eur. J. Radiol. (2016) 85(12) (2269–2274)](S0720048X16303072)(10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.10.009) / Stanzione, A.; Imbriaco, M.; Cocozza, S.; Fusco, F.; Rusconi, G.; Nappi, C.; Mirone, V.; Mangiapia, F.; Brunetti, A.; Ragozzino, A.; Longo, N.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0720-048X. - 87:(2017), p. 125. [10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.011]
Erratum to “Biparametric 3t magnetic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: A further improvement of PI-RADS v2? [Eur. J. Radiol. (2016) 85(12) (2269–2274)](S0720048X16303072)(10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.10.009)
Stanzione A.;Imbriaco M.;Cocozza S.;Rusconi G.;Nappi C.;Mirone V.;Mangiapia F.;Brunetti A.;Ragozzino A.;Longo N.
2017
Abstract
The publisher regrets that there is an error in the title of this article. The title should be read as: “Biparametric 3t magnetic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: A further improvement of PI-RADS v2?” Instead of: “Biparametric 3t magentic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: A further improvement of PI-RADS v2?” The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
