The energy needs of a Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB) are fully met by renewable energy sources. These strongly depend on their characteristics and on meteorological-geographical factors, but also on different kinds of energy balance. The aim of this paper is to investigate the comparison between two different photovoltaic systems (fixed and tracking) and two kinds of energy balance (yearly and monthly), to evaluate which system better achieves the definition of NZEB for an existing residential building, so limiting exchanges with the national electricity grid. A dynamic energy simulation software (DesignBuilder) is used. The results show that the photovoltaic surface which attains the NZEB target on yearly basis not always achieves the same objective when the energy balance is performed on monthly basis. Furthermore, considering a monthly balance, the size of the photovoltaic system with biaxial solar tracking is 45% minor compared to the fixed photovoltaic system, thanks to a steadier energy production.

Fixed and tracking PV system for Net Zero Energy Buildings: comparison between annual and monthly energy balance / D'Agostino, Diana; Minelli, Federico; Minichiello, Francesco. - 16th SDEWES Conference Dubrovnik 2021:(2021). (Intervento presentato al convegno 16th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems (SDEWES) tenutosi a Dubrovnik nel 10-15 Ottobre 2021).

Fixed and tracking PV system for Net Zero Energy Buildings: comparison between annual and monthly energy balance

Diana D'Agostino
;
Federico Minelli;Francesco Minichiello.
2021

Abstract

The energy needs of a Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB) are fully met by renewable energy sources. These strongly depend on their characteristics and on meteorological-geographical factors, but also on different kinds of energy balance. The aim of this paper is to investigate the comparison between two different photovoltaic systems (fixed and tracking) and two kinds of energy balance (yearly and monthly), to evaluate which system better achieves the definition of NZEB for an existing residential building, so limiting exchanges with the national electricity grid. A dynamic energy simulation software (DesignBuilder) is used. The results show that the photovoltaic surface which attains the NZEB target on yearly basis not always achieves the same objective when the energy balance is performed on monthly basis. Furthermore, considering a monthly balance, the size of the photovoltaic system with biaxial solar tracking is 45% minor compared to the fixed photovoltaic system, thanks to a steadier energy production.
2021
Fixed and tracking PV system for Net Zero Energy Buildings: comparison between annual and monthly energy balance / D'Agostino, Diana; Minelli, Federico; Minichiello, Francesco. - 16th SDEWES Conference Dubrovnik 2021:(2021). (Intervento presentato al convegno 16th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems (SDEWES) tenutosi a Dubrovnik nel 10-15 Ottobre 2021).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/920726
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact