In the last few years, various Kantian commentators have drawn attention to a number of features in the self-reference device of transcendental apperception that have emerged from the contemporary debate on the irreducibility of self-ascription of thoughts in the first person. Known as I-thoughts, these have suggested a connection between some aspects of Kant’s philosophy and Wittgenstein’s philosophico-linguistic analysis of the grammatical rule of the term I. This paper would like to review some of such correspondences, avoiding any mechanical association between Kant and an elusive reading of the I think, e. g. as suggested mutatis mutandis by McDowell and Kitcher.
Kant and I as subject / Forgione, Luca. - (2013), pp. 117-127.
Kant and I as subject
FORGIONE, Luca
2013
Abstract
In the last few years, various Kantian commentators have drawn attention to a number of features in the self-reference device of transcendental apperception that have emerged from the contemporary debate on the irreducibility of self-ascription of thoughts in the first person. Known as I-thoughts, these have suggested a connection between some aspects of Kant’s philosophy and Wittgenstein’s philosophico-linguistic analysis of the grammatical rule of the term I. This paper would like to review some of such correspondences, avoiding any mechanical association between Kant and an elusive reading of the I think, e. g. as suggested mutatis mutandis by McDowell and Kitcher.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Forgione - I as subject.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
183.1 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
183.1 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.