Re-Entry Comparison of a Spacecraft in Low Earth Orbit: Propulsion-Assisted vs. Non-Propulsive Configurations

This paper presents a mission concept for a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite equipped with a payload for space experiments, designed to be recovered on Earth post-mission. The focus of this study is on developing a mission concept with fast de-orbit and accurate landing capability for a small satellite payload. Two re-entry configurations are analyzed: one employing a deployable aero-brake heat shield for aerodynamic descent and another integrating a propulsion system. Aerodynamic analysis of the capsule, including drag coefficient and stability at relevant altitudes, was conducted using the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method. A trade-off analysis, accounting for uncertainties such as CD, atmospheric density, and ignition timing, revealed significant differences in mission profiles. A propulsion system providing a ΔV of approximately 100 m/s reduces descent time from 54 days (aerodynamic-only re-entry) to under 1 h, without altering trajectory. Drag-related uncertainties contribute to a landing dispersion of ~100 km, while a ±1% error in total impulse increases dispersion to 400 km. A monopropellant rocket engine was preliminarily designed, meeting constraints such as catalytic chamber pressure and performance targets. The resulting thruster, weighing under 4 kg and contained within a 250 mm-high, 350 mm-diameter cylinder, supports three potential component layouts.