In this paper, I argue that Quentin Meillassoux’s speculative materialism is metaphysically excessive for the purposes of the philosophy of science. In its place, I develop a moderate structural realism that integrates neoKantian semantic constructivism with Moritz Schlick’s neoempiricist realism. First, drawing on Ernst Cassirer, I contend that observation is irreducibly theoryladen; so construed, the absolute contingency of nature can be accommodated within scientific practice without recourse to speculative metaphysics. Second, I deflate Cassirer’s idealist holism by leveraging Schlick’s principle of verification and his notion of “coordination” (Zuordnung), which together forge the relationship between theoretical concepts and observational procedures. Read alongside recent work in epistemology, this framework preserves a contextrelative analytic/ synthetic distinction and sustains an empirically robust realism. The upshot is a constructivist–realist compromise: scientific theories represent internal routes to experience and to the external world, and the history of science is the history of the coevolution of theory and experience.
“Non nel cielo sono date le stelle”, ma la loro esistenza sì: una risposta al realismo di Quentin Meillassoux / Laino, L.. - In: MECHANE. - ISSN 2784-9961. - 10:(2025), pp. 191-211.
“Non nel cielo sono date le stelle”, ma la loro esistenza sì: una risposta al realismo di Quentin Meillassoux
luigi laino
2025
Abstract
In this paper, I argue that Quentin Meillassoux’s speculative materialism is metaphysically excessive for the purposes of the philosophy of science. In its place, I develop a moderate structural realism that integrates neoKantian semantic constructivism with Moritz Schlick’s neoempiricist realism. First, drawing on Ernst Cassirer, I contend that observation is irreducibly theoryladen; so construed, the absolute contingency of nature can be accommodated within scientific practice without recourse to speculative metaphysics. Second, I deflate Cassirer’s idealist holism by leveraging Schlick’s principle of verification and his notion of “coordination” (Zuordnung), which together forge the relationship between theoretical concepts and observational procedures. Read alongside recent work in epistemology, this framework preserves a contextrelative analytic/ synthetic distinction and sustains an empirically robust realism. The upshot is a constructivist–realist compromise: scientific theories represent internal routes to experience and to the external world, and the history of science is the history of the coevolution of theory and experience.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Laino Tecnica e natura mechane.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
307.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
307.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


