This paper begins by introducing the concept of the pedagogy of the common world, situating Morten Korsgaard’s specific interpretation of this pedagogy within contemporary debates that critically examine the notions of progress and enclosure. Against this backdrop, it addresses the question of “commoning” by comparing the perspectives of Arendt and Dewey. It argues, first, that their approaches offer two distinct tonalities in balancing renewal with conservation and continuity in education. Second, despite their significant differences, their conceptual frameworks may share a common root. This shared foundation is explored by drawing on the work of 20th-century Italian educationalist Aldo Capitini, whose idea of “prophetic education” provides a lens to examine both the differences and the similarities between Deweyan and Arendtian approaches. Capitini’s perspective also suggests the possibility of a form of beginning and commoning that aligns with a sense of progressivity and dynamic growth. Finally, the paper uses Capitini’s ideas to facilitate a comparison between Korsgaard’s and Biesta’s interpretations of a classic concept from the German educational tradition, Aufforderung zur Selbsttätigkeit (summons to self-activity). It argues that while Korsgaard’s efforts to “retune education” are valuable, Biesta highlights dimensions of this concept that may otherwise be overlooked.

Beyond the educational enclosure: commoning and/or opening / Oliverio, S.. - In: STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION. - ISSN 0039-3746. - (In corso di stampa).

Beyond the educational enclosure: commoning and/or opening

Stefano Oliverio
In corso di stampa

Abstract

This paper begins by introducing the concept of the pedagogy of the common world, situating Morten Korsgaard’s specific interpretation of this pedagogy within contemporary debates that critically examine the notions of progress and enclosure. Against this backdrop, it addresses the question of “commoning” by comparing the perspectives of Arendt and Dewey. It argues, first, that their approaches offer two distinct tonalities in balancing renewal with conservation and continuity in education. Second, despite their significant differences, their conceptual frameworks may share a common root. This shared foundation is explored by drawing on the work of 20th-century Italian educationalist Aldo Capitini, whose idea of “prophetic education” provides a lens to examine both the differences and the similarities between Deweyan and Arendtian approaches. Capitini’s perspective also suggests the possibility of a form of beginning and commoning that aligns with a sense of progressivity and dynamic growth. Finally, the paper uses Capitini’s ideas to facilitate a comparison between Korsgaard’s and Biesta’s interpretations of a classic concept from the German educational tradition, Aufforderung zur Selbsttätigkeit (summons to self-activity). It argues that while Korsgaard’s efforts to “retune education” are valuable, Biesta highlights dimensions of this concept that may otherwise be overlooked.
In corso di stampa
Beyond the educational enclosure: commoning and/or opening / Oliverio, S.. - In: STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION. - ISSN 0039-3746. - (In corso di stampa).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/1053757
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact