The objective of this study was to evaluate the hydraulic conductance in various components of peach trees grown on rootstocks with contrasting size-controlling potentials. The experiment was conducted on `Crimson Lady' peach trees grafted onto two rootstocks: a semi-dwarfing rootstock, K-146-44 (P. salicina.3.P. persica hybrid) and a vigorous rootstock, Nemaguard (seed-propagated Prunus persica.3.P. davidiana hybrid). Hydraulic conductance of leaves, stems, trunk, graft union, and root system was measured in the scion/rootstocks with a high-pressure flow meter. Total leaf area and dry-matter partitioning into main tree components were also determined. The above and below ground portions of trees grown on Nemaguard rootstock were 393% and 299% larger, respectively, than trees grown on K-146-44 rootstock. Whether trees were grafted on Nemaguard or K-146-44, the root system accounted for most of the resistance to water flow through the tree. When hydraulic conductance was expressed per unit leaf area, trees on K-146-44 rootstock had significantly lower root conductance than trees on Nemaguard rootstock. Rootstocks had no effect on hydraulic conductance through the scion or the graft union. Trees on K-146-44 also partitioned relatively more dry matter to roots and leaves and less to stems than trees on Nemaguard. The results suggest that high root resistance plays a central role in the dwarfing mechanism induced by the size-controlling rootstock.

Hydraulic conductance of peach trees grafted on rootstocks with differing size-controlling potentials / Basile, Boris; Marsal, J.; Solari, L. I.; Tyree, M. T.; Bryla, D. R.; AND DEJONG, T. M.. - In: JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 1462-0316. - 78:6(2003), pp. 768-774. [10.1080/14620316.2003.11511697]

Hydraulic conductance of peach trees grafted on rootstocks with differing size-controlling potentials

BASILE, BORIS;
2003

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the hydraulic conductance in various components of peach trees grown on rootstocks with contrasting size-controlling potentials. The experiment was conducted on `Crimson Lady' peach trees grafted onto two rootstocks: a semi-dwarfing rootstock, K-146-44 (P. salicina.3.P. persica hybrid) and a vigorous rootstock, Nemaguard (seed-propagated Prunus persica.3.P. davidiana hybrid). Hydraulic conductance of leaves, stems, trunk, graft union, and root system was measured in the scion/rootstocks with a high-pressure flow meter. Total leaf area and dry-matter partitioning into main tree components were also determined. The above and below ground portions of trees grown on Nemaguard rootstock were 393% and 299% larger, respectively, than trees grown on K-146-44 rootstock. Whether trees were grafted on Nemaguard or K-146-44, the root system accounted for most of the resistance to water flow through the tree. When hydraulic conductance was expressed per unit leaf area, trees on K-146-44 rootstock had significantly lower root conductance than trees on Nemaguard rootstock. Rootstocks had no effect on hydraulic conductance through the scion or the graft union. Trees on K-146-44 also partitioned relatively more dry matter to roots and leaves and less to stems than trees on Nemaguard. The results suggest that high root resistance plays a central role in the dwarfing mechanism induced by the size-controlling rootstock.
2003
Hydraulic conductance of peach trees grafted on rootstocks with differing size-controlling potentials / Basile, Boris; Marsal, J.; Solari, L. I.; Tyree, M. T.; Bryla, D. R.; AND DEJONG, T. M.. - In: JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 1462-0316. - 78:6(2003), pp. 768-774. [10.1080/14620316.2003.11511697]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/132455
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 60
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 55
social impact