This seminal essay, that has gained wide recognition and has been published in the US, France, Italy, Russia and Ukraine, uses the many, outstanding studies published in recent years to sketch the outline of a new interpretation of the 1931-1933 Soviet famines and of the Ukrainian Holodomor. This interpretation takes into account both the general, and complex Soviet picture, and the undeniable relevance of the national question. The author thus furthered the understanding of the “Great Famine” and stimulated a debate that contributed to pulling down the wall that still stands between Ukrainian, Russian and Western students of the Soviet famines as well as the even taller and stronger one isolating these students from their colleagues studying the European twentieth century. At the end of the essay the author addresses the question of whether and in which sense the Ukrainian Holodomor belongs to the genocide category. He answers positively, but nevertheless remarks differences from the Jewish Holocaust and notes that the famine was not a “planned” genocide conceived in “Moscow” by Russians who were then also suffering from hunger, albeit less dramatically. Rather, Stalin and the communist party leaders decided to take advantage of a famine caused by their own blunders, but which they did not want or expect, to teach a lesson to peasants in general and Ukraine in particular. Their decision, taken in the fall of 1932, explains why the famine grew into aHolodomor. Insofar as this was therefore the consequence of conscious human policies, the term genocide can be used.

The Soviet 1931-1933 Famines and the Ukrainian Holodomor / Graziosi, Andrea. - STAMPA. - (2008), pp. 1-20.

The Soviet 1931-1933 Famines and the Ukrainian Holodomor

GRAZIOSI, ANDREA
2008

Abstract

This seminal essay, that has gained wide recognition and has been published in the US, France, Italy, Russia and Ukraine, uses the many, outstanding studies published in recent years to sketch the outline of a new interpretation of the 1931-1933 Soviet famines and of the Ukrainian Holodomor. This interpretation takes into account both the general, and complex Soviet picture, and the undeniable relevance of the national question. The author thus furthered the understanding of the “Great Famine” and stimulated a debate that contributed to pulling down the wall that still stands between Ukrainian, Russian and Western students of the Soviet famines as well as the even taller and stronger one isolating these students from their colleagues studying the European twentieth century. At the end of the essay the author addresses the question of whether and in which sense the Ukrainian Holodomor belongs to the genocide category. He answers positively, but nevertheless remarks differences from the Jewish Holocaust and notes that the famine was not a “planned” genocide conceived in “Moscow” by Russians who were then also suffering from hunger, albeit less dramatically. Rather, Stalin and the communist party leaders decided to take advantage of a famine caused by their own blunders, but which they did not want or expect, to teach a lesson to peasants in general and Ukraine in particular. Their decision, taken in the fall of 1932, explains why the famine grew into aHolodomor. Insofar as this was therefore the consequence of conscious human policies, the term genocide can be used.
2008
9781932650051
The Soviet 1931-1933 Famines and the Ukrainian Holodomor / Graziosi, Andrea. - STAMPA. - (2008), pp. 1-20.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
GraziosiFaminesPDF.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 90.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
90.99 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/335138
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact