AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the material effectiveness of oversewing the staple line following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. MATERIAL OF STUDY: A prospective randomized trial has been performed on 100 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Just before the intervention patients were randomized to receive (Group A) or not receive (Group B) a polypropylene 3-0 running oversewing suture of the staple line. RESULTS: By evaluating preoperative general demographics features and co-morbidities between group A and group B no statistical difference was observed. Main complications evaluated were fistol, bleeding and stenosis and there were no significant difference in fistulas occurrence (p = 0.55) and bleeding (p = 0,65) while on the other hand it has to be remarked how sleeve stenosis has been significantly higher when oversew is performed (p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: Staple line leakage is a worrisome complication of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Despite some reports describe oversewing of the staple line as the solution to prevent such problem; other authors have demonstrated the incidence of leaks being the same in oversewed and not oversewed patients. CONCLUSION: This randomized trial has so far shown oversew of LSG to be significantly useless to prevent fistulas formation in patients selected according to our study design.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Do we need to oversew the staple line? / Musella, Mario; Milone, Marco; Bellini, M; Leongito, M; Guarino, R; Milone, Francesco. - In: ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA. - ISSN 0003-469X. - STAMPA. - 82:4(2011), pp. 273-277.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Do we need to oversew the staple line?

MUSELLA, MARIO;MILONE, MARCO;MILONE, FRANCESCO
2011

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the material effectiveness of oversewing the staple line following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. MATERIAL OF STUDY: A prospective randomized trial has been performed on 100 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Just before the intervention patients were randomized to receive (Group A) or not receive (Group B) a polypropylene 3-0 running oversewing suture of the staple line. RESULTS: By evaluating preoperative general demographics features and co-morbidities between group A and group B no statistical difference was observed. Main complications evaluated were fistol, bleeding and stenosis and there were no significant difference in fistulas occurrence (p = 0.55) and bleeding (p = 0,65) while on the other hand it has to be remarked how sleeve stenosis has been significantly higher when oversew is performed (p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: Staple line leakage is a worrisome complication of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Despite some reports describe oversewing of the staple line as the solution to prevent such problem; other authors have demonstrated the incidence of leaks being the same in oversewed and not oversewed patients. CONCLUSION: This randomized trial has so far shown oversew of LSG to be significantly useless to prevent fistulas formation in patients selected according to our study design.
2011
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Do we need to oversew the staple line? / Musella, Mario; Milone, Marco; Bellini, M; Leongito, M; Guarino, R; Milone, Francesco. - In: ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA. - ISSN 0003-469X. - STAMPA. - 82:4(2011), pp. 273-277.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ann Ital Chir 2011 LSG Oversewing.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Do we need to oversew the staple line?
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 67.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
67.48 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/457684
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 43
social impact