Metastatic colorectal cancer harboring a mutation in codon 12 or 13 of the KRAS gene does not benefit from therapy with antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The implementation of community KRAS testing is generating a rapid flow of new data that have implications for the pathologist and testing guidelines, besides the physician. Therefore, it seems timely to draw together the threads of this large body of information in order that pathologists can be knowledgeable partners in the multidisciplinary process of targeted cancer therapy, and to help refine current testing guidelines. This review addresses: (1) the most relevant methodological and technical aspects of KRAS testing in terms of sample site (primary/metastatic), test specimens (resection/biopsy/cytology), and the diverse molecular methods available; (2) issues related to daily practice, namely the timing of the test, its turnaround time and the quality control procedures; and (3) the evidence related to the relationship between KRAS genetic intratumoral heterogeneity, clinical sensitivity of mutational detection tools and anti-EGFR treatment outcome. Hopefully, in the near future, elucidation of the potential of biomarker panels, and of the mechanisms underlying primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy will refine even further personalized treatment regimes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: challenges, controversies, breakthroughs, and beyond / Malapelle, Umberto; Carlomagno, Chiara; De Luca, C; Bellevicine, Claudio; Troncone, Giancarlo. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 0021-9746. - 67:1(2014), pp. 1-9. [10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201835]

KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: challenges, controversies, breakthroughs, and beyond

MALAPELLE, UMBERTO;CARLOMAGNO, Chiara;De Luca C;BELLEVICINE, CLAUDIO;TRONCONE, GIANCARLO
2014

Abstract

Metastatic colorectal cancer harboring a mutation in codon 12 or 13 of the KRAS gene does not benefit from therapy with antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The implementation of community KRAS testing is generating a rapid flow of new data that have implications for the pathologist and testing guidelines, besides the physician. Therefore, it seems timely to draw together the threads of this large body of information in order that pathologists can be knowledgeable partners in the multidisciplinary process of targeted cancer therapy, and to help refine current testing guidelines. This review addresses: (1) the most relevant methodological and technical aspects of KRAS testing in terms of sample site (primary/metastatic), test specimens (resection/biopsy/cytology), and the diverse molecular methods available; (2) issues related to daily practice, namely the timing of the test, its turnaround time and the quality control procedures; and (3) the evidence related to the relationship between KRAS genetic intratumoral heterogeneity, clinical sensitivity of mutational detection tools and anti-EGFR treatment outcome. Hopefully, in the near future, elucidation of the potential of biomarker panels, and of the mechanisms underlying primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy will refine even further personalized treatment regimes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
2014
KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: challenges, controversies, breakthroughs, and beyond / Malapelle, Umberto; Carlomagno, Chiara; De Luca, C; Bellevicine, Claudio; Troncone, Giancarlo. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 0021-9746. - 67:1(2014), pp. 1-9. [10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201835]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
J Clin Pathol-2014-Malapelle-1-9.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 621.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
621.56 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/559926
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact