A systematic comparison is made of parametric (i.e., ordinary leastsquares regressions and related generalizations) and nonparametric (i.e., kernel regressions and regression trees) log-linear gravity models for reproducing international trade. Experiments were conducted to estimate a log-linear gravity model reproducing import and export trade fows in quantity between Italy and 13 world economic zones, based on a panel estimation data set. The best parametric regression model was estimated to defne a baseline reference model. Some spec-ifcations of nonparametric models, belonging to the categories of kernel regressions and regression trees, were also estimated. The performance of parametric and nonparametric models is contrasted through a comparison of goodness-of-ft measures (R2, mean absolute percentage error) both in estimation and in hold-out sample validation. To assess the differences in model elasticity and forecasts, both parametric and nonparametric models are applied to future scenarios and the corresponding results compared.
Empirical comparison of parametric and nonparametric trade gravity models / Gallo, M.; Marzano, Vittorio; Simonelli, F.; Simonelli, Fulvio. - In: TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD. - ISSN 0361-1981. - 2269:(2012), pp. 29-41. [10.3141/2269-04]
Empirical comparison of parametric and nonparametric trade gravity models
MARZANO, VITTORIO;SIMONELLI, FULVIO
2012
Abstract
A systematic comparison is made of parametric (i.e., ordinary leastsquares regressions and related generalizations) and nonparametric (i.e., kernel regressions and regression trees) log-linear gravity models for reproducing international trade. Experiments were conducted to estimate a log-linear gravity model reproducing import and export trade fows in quantity between Italy and 13 world economic zones, based on a panel estimation data set. The best parametric regression model was estimated to defne a baseline reference model. Some spec-ifcations of nonparametric models, belonging to the categories of kernel regressions and regression trees, were also estimated. The performance of parametric and nonparametric models is contrasted through a comparison of goodness-of-ft measures (R2, mean absolute percentage error) both in estimation and in hold-out sample validation. To assess the differences in model elasticity and forecasts, both parametric and nonparametric models are applied to future scenarios and the corresponding results compared.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.