The increasing complexity of urban systems is making robustness a crucial requirement for structural design. The paper deals with the concept of robustness of civil structures against extreme events. After a brief literature survey, a novel point of view to robustness assessment is proposed, fitting the most accepted robustness definition. The proposed approach is discussed and compared with other methodologies for quantifying structural robustness. Thus, the methodology is developed and applied to an existing precast industrial building case study, assumed to be prone to seismic and wind hazards. In particular, the case study is assumed to be located in Emilia, Italy, where a significant earthquake occurred in 2012, causing relevant damage to gravity load designed industrial buildings. Three structural options are discussed, namely a simple supported beam–column connection (gravity load designed solution) and two pinned connections (seismic designed solution), where only one of them satisfies the current structural code requirements. The results are discussed in terms of robustness quantification, by means of a robustness matrix. The authors envisage that this approach can be effectively adopted for portfolios of existing structures, to prioritize retrofitting interventions, aimed at maximizing the overall risk mitigation with limited economic resources. © 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Defining structural robustness under seismic and simultaneous actions: an application to precast RC buildings / Asprone, Domenico; DE RISI, Raffaele; Manfredi, Gaetano. - In: BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1570-761X. - 14:2(2016), pp. 485-499. [10.1007/s10518-015-9820-4]
Defining structural robustness under seismic and simultaneous actions: an application to precast RC buildings
Asprone, Domenico;DE RISI, RAFFAELE;MANFREDI, GAETANO
2016
Abstract
The increasing complexity of urban systems is making robustness a crucial requirement for structural design. The paper deals with the concept of robustness of civil structures against extreme events. After a brief literature survey, a novel point of view to robustness assessment is proposed, fitting the most accepted robustness definition. The proposed approach is discussed and compared with other methodologies for quantifying structural robustness. Thus, the methodology is developed and applied to an existing precast industrial building case study, assumed to be prone to seismic and wind hazards. In particular, the case study is assumed to be located in Emilia, Italy, where a significant earthquake occurred in 2012, causing relevant damage to gravity load designed industrial buildings. Three structural options are discussed, namely a simple supported beam–column connection (gravity load designed solution) and two pinned connections (seismic designed solution), where only one of them satisfies the current structural code requirements. The results are discussed in terms of robustness quantification, by means of a robustness matrix. The authors envisage that this approach can be effectively adopted for portfolios of existing structures, to prioritize retrofitting interventions, aimed at maximizing the overall risk mitigation with limited economic resources. © 2015 Springer Science+Business Media DordrechtI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.