Ontogeny is usually studied by analyzing a deformation series spanning over juvenile to adult shapes. In geometric morphometrics, this approach implies applying generalized Procrustes analysis coupled with principal component analysis on multiple individuals or multiple species datasets. The trouble with such a procedure is that it mixes intra- and inter-group variation. While MANCOVA models are relevant statistical/mathematical tools to draw inferences about the similarities of trajectories, if one wants to observe and interpret the morphological deformation alone by filtering inter-group variability, a particular tool, namely parallel transport, is necessary. In the context of ontogenetic trajectories, one should firstly perform separate multivariate regressions between shape and size, using regression predictions to estimate within-group deformations relative to the smallest individuals. These deformations are then applied to a common reference (the mean of per-group smallest individuals). The estimation of deformations can be performed on the Riemannian manifold by using sophisticated connection metrics. Nevertheless, parallel transport can be effectively achieved by estimating deformations in the Euclidean space via ordinary Procrustes analysis. This approach proved very useful in comparing ontogenetic trajectories of species presenting large morphological differences at early developmental stages. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The conceptual framework of ontogenetic trajectories: Parallel transport allows the recognition and visualization of pure deformation patterns / Piras, P.; Teresi, L.; Traversetti, L.; Varano, V.; Gabriele, S.; Kotsakis, T.; Raia, Pasquale; Puddu, P. E.; Scalici, M.. - In: EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 1520-541X. - 18:3(2016), pp. 182-200. [10.1111/ede.12186]

The conceptual framework of ontogenetic trajectories: Parallel transport allows the recognition and visualization of pure deformation patterns

RAIA, PASQUALE;
2016

Abstract

Ontogeny is usually studied by analyzing a deformation series spanning over juvenile to adult shapes. In geometric morphometrics, this approach implies applying generalized Procrustes analysis coupled with principal component analysis on multiple individuals or multiple species datasets. The trouble with such a procedure is that it mixes intra- and inter-group variation. While MANCOVA models are relevant statistical/mathematical tools to draw inferences about the similarities of trajectories, if one wants to observe and interpret the morphological deformation alone by filtering inter-group variability, a particular tool, namely parallel transport, is necessary. In the context of ontogenetic trajectories, one should firstly perform separate multivariate regressions between shape and size, using regression predictions to estimate within-group deformations relative to the smallest individuals. These deformations are then applied to a common reference (the mean of per-group smallest individuals). The estimation of deformations can be performed on the Riemannian manifold by using sophisticated connection metrics. Nevertheless, parallel transport can be effectively achieved by estimating deformations in the Euclidean space via ordinary Procrustes analysis. This approach proved very useful in comparing ontogenetic trajectories of species presenting large morphological differences at early developmental stages. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2016
The conceptual framework of ontogenetic trajectories: Parallel transport allows the recognition and visualization of pure deformation patterns / Piras, P.; Teresi, L.; Traversetti, L.; Varano, V.; Gabriele, S.; Kotsakis, T.; Raia, Pasquale; Puddu, P. E.; Scalici, M.. - In: EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 1520-541X. - 18:3(2016), pp. 182-200. [10.1111/ede.12186]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/636114
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact