BACKGROUND: Although the feasibility of minimally invasive resection of small gastric GISTs is well established, less is known about safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for large tumors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed, using a prospectively maintained comprehensive database. Patients were divided into two groups according to tumor size: Case group with tumors > 5 cm and control group with tumors <5 cm. Hospital charts were reviewed, and various outcome measures recorded, including operative time, estimated operative blood loss, post-operative leak, stasis, infection and recurrence. RESULTS: No tumors were ruptured during surgical manipulation and no major morbidity or mortality occurred in either group. Operative time (75,8 ± 33,1 min in large cases vs 75,8 ± 33,1 min in small cases) was similar in both groups (p = 0,61). The incidence of post-operative complications did not differ between the two groups. In details there were 21 out of 25 (84%) uncomplicated cases among small GISTs versus 17 out of 24 (70,8%) uncomplicated cases among large GISTs (p = 0,32). CONCLUSION: This matched-pair case control study demonstrates that laparoscopic wedge resection for large gastric GISTs is safe and effective, as demonstrated for small tumors.

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy for large gastrointestinal stromal tumors / Milone, Marco; Elmore, U; Musella, Mario; Parise, P; Zotti, M. C; Bracale, Umberto; Di Lauro, K; Manigrasso, M; Milone, Francesco; Rosati, R.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0748-7983. - 43:4(2017), pp. 796-800-800. [10.1016/j.ejso.2017.01.005]

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy for large gastrointestinal stromal tumors

MILONE, MARCO;MUSELLA, MARIO;BRACALE, UMBERTO;Manigrasso, M;MILONE, FRANCESCO;
2017

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the feasibility of minimally invasive resection of small gastric GISTs is well established, less is known about safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for large tumors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed, using a prospectively maintained comprehensive database. Patients were divided into two groups according to tumor size: Case group with tumors > 5 cm and control group with tumors <5 cm. Hospital charts were reviewed, and various outcome measures recorded, including operative time, estimated operative blood loss, post-operative leak, stasis, infection and recurrence. RESULTS: No tumors were ruptured during surgical manipulation and no major morbidity or mortality occurred in either group. Operative time (75,8 ± 33,1 min in large cases vs 75,8 ± 33,1 min in small cases) was similar in both groups (p = 0,61). The incidence of post-operative complications did not differ between the two groups. In details there were 21 out of 25 (84%) uncomplicated cases among small GISTs versus 17 out of 24 (70,8%) uncomplicated cases among large GISTs (p = 0,32). CONCLUSION: This matched-pair case control study demonstrates that laparoscopic wedge resection for large gastric GISTs is safe and effective, as demonstrated for small tumors.
2017
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy for large gastrointestinal stromal tumors / Milone, Marco; Elmore, U; Musella, Mario; Parise, P; Zotti, M. C; Bracale, Umberto; Di Lauro, K; Manigrasso, M; Milone, Francesco; Rosati, R.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0748-7983. - 43:4(2017), pp. 796-800-800. [10.1016/j.ejso.2017.01.005]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 167.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
167.39 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/668370
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact