The research aims at developing robust assessment and design strategies to support industrial engineers in the selection of optimal solutions for safety and ergonomics. It is realized through a successful integration of knowledge in experimental statistics, biomechanical modelling and advanced engineering design. The robust assessment and design strategies have been applied to the context of aircraft and automotive seat design, respectively. They rely on both physical and VR simulated experiments. In the former case, seat comfort is assessed via subjective perceptions and postural responses to seat exposures measured via interface pressure maps; whereas in simulated experiments, ergonomic evaluations are based on postural indexes based on joint angles. The adoption of the proposed strategies has provided interesting results in deepening the knowledge on seat ergonomics with focus on three main critical aspects: 1) differences in postural responses to seated exposures; 2) the impact of gender-based postural differences on objective measures of seat discomfort; 3) the usefulness of postural measurements (i.e. seat-interface pressure and joint angles) in finding significant differences in seat designs across different target populations of users.
Statistics for Safety and Ergonomics in Design / Vanacore, Amalia; Lanzotti, Antonio; Percuoco, Chiara; Capasso, Agostino; Liccardo, Fabio; Vitolo, Bonaventura. - (2016). (Intervento presentato al convegno SIS 2016 48th Scientific Meeting of the Italian Statistical Society tenutosi a Salerno nel 8-10 giugno 2016).
Statistics for Safety and Ergonomics in Design
VANACORE, AMALIA;LANZOTTI, ANTONIO;Percuoco, Chiara;
2016
Abstract
The research aims at developing robust assessment and design strategies to support industrial engineers in the selection of optimal solutions for safety and ergonomics. It is realized through a successful integration of knowledge in experimental statistics, biomechanical modelling and advanced engineering design. The robust assessment and design strategies have been applied to the context of aircraft and automotive seat design, respectively. They rely on both physical and VR simulated experiments. In the former case, seat comfort is assessed via subjective perceptions and postural responses to seat exposures measured via interface pressure maps; whereas in simulated experiments, ergonomic evaluations are based on postural indexes based on joint angles. The adoption of the proposed strategies has provided interesting results in deepening the knowledge on seat ergonomics with focus on three main critical aspects: 1) differences in postural responses to seated exposures; 2) the impact of gender-based postural differences on objective measures of seat discomfort; 3) the usefulness of postural measurements (i.e. seat-interface pressure and joint angles) in finding significant differences in seat designs across different target populations of users.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SIS_2016_SpeedFormatPosterSession_CompeteThanksToStatistics_vanacore_lanzotti.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: abstract
Tipologia:
Abstract
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
46.57 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
46.57 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.