The main goal of the Divertor Tokamak Test facility (DTT) is to explore alternative power exhaust solu- tions for DEMO. The principal objective is to mitigate the risk of a difficult extrapolation to fusion reactor of the conventional divertor based on detached conditions under test on ITER. The task includes several issues, as: (i) demonstrating a heat exhaust system capable of withstanding the large load of DEMO in case of inadequate radiated power fraction; (ii) closing the gaps in the exhaust area that cannot be ad- dressed by present devices; (iii) demonstrating how the possible implemented solutions (e.g., advanced divertor configurations or liquid metals) can be integrated in a DEMO device. In view of these goals, the basic physical DTT parameters have been selected according to the follow- ing guidelines: (i) edge conditions as close as possible to DEMO in terms of dimensionless parameters; (ii) flexibility to test a wide set of divertor concepts and techniques; (iii) compatibility with bulk plasma performance; (iv) an upper bound of 500 M€ for the investment costs.

The Divertor Tokamak Test facility proposal: Physical requirements and reference design / Crisanti, F.; Albanese, R.; Granucci, G.; Martone, R.; Sonato, P; Affinito, L.; Anemona, A.; Apicella, M. L.; Batistoni, P.; Calabrò, G.; Cardinali, A.; Ceccuzzi, S.; Centioli, C.; Corato, V.; Costa, P.; Cucchiaro, A.; Della Corte, A.; De Marzi, G.; Di Zenobio, A.; Fiamozzi Zignani, C.; Gabellieri, L.; Lampasi, A.; Maddaluno, G.; Maffia, G.; Marocco, D.; Mazzitelli, G.; Messina, G.; Mirizzi, F.; Moneti, M.; Muzzi, L.; Pizzuto, A.; Ramogida, G.; Ravera, G. L.; Righetti, R.; Roccella, S.; Starace, F.; Tomassetti, G.; Tuccillo, A.; Tudisco, O.; Turtù, S.; Villari, S.; Viola, B.; Vitale, V.; Vlad, G.; Zito, P.; Zonca, F.; Bruschi, A.; Farina, D.; Figini, L.; Garavaglia, S.; Lontano, M.; Micheletti, D.; Nowak, S.; Sozzi, C.; Ambrosino, R.; Barbato, L.; Ciattaglia, S.; Coccorese, D.; Coccorese, V.; de Magistris, M.; Di Gironimo, G.; Loschiavo, V. P.; Marzullo, D.; Mastrostefano, S.; Minucci, S.; Mozzillo, R.; Palmaccio, R.; Pericoli-Ridolfini, V.; Pironti, A.; Rubinacci, G.; Tarallo, A.; Ventre, S.; Villone, F.; Maggiora, R.; Milanesio, D.; Agostinetti, P.; Bolzonella, T.; Carraro, L.; Fassina, A.; Franz, P.; Gaio, E.; Gnesotto, F.; Innocente, P.; Luchetta, A.; Manduchi, G.; Marrelli, L.; Martin, P.; Peruzzo, S.; Piovan, R.; Puiatti, M. E.; Spizzo, G.; Scarin, P.; Spolaore, M.; Toigo, V.; Valisa, M.; Zanotto, L.; Gorini, G.; Giruzzi, G.; Duval, B.; Reimerdes, H.; de Baar, M.; Zagórski, R.. - In: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY. - ISSN 2352-1791. - 12:(2017), pp. 1330-1335. [10.1016/j.nme.2017.05.008]

The Divertor Tokamak Test facility proposal: Physical requirements and reference design

R. Albanese;R. Ambrosino;D. Coccorese;V. Coccorese;M. de Magistris;G. Di Gironimo;V. P. Loschiavo;D. Marzullo;S. Minucci;R. Mozzillo;A. Pironti;G. Rubinacci;A. Tarallo;F. Villone;
2017

Abstract

The main goal of the Divertor Tokamak Test facility (DTT) is to explore alternative power exhaust solu- tions for DEMO. The principal objective is to mitigate the risk of a difficult extrapolation to fusion reactor of the conventional divertor based on detached conditions under test on ITER. The task includes several issues, as: (i) demonstrating a heat exhaust system capable of withstanding the large load of DEMO in case of inadequate radiated power fraction; (ii) closing the gaps in the exhaust area that cannot be ad- dressed by present devices; (iii) demonstrating how the possible implemented solutions (e.g., advanced divertor configurations or liquid metals) can be integrated in a DEMO device. In view of these goals, the basic physical DTT parameters have been selected according to the follow- ing guidelines: (i) edge conditions as close as possible to DEMO in terms of dimensionless parameters; (ii) flexibility to test a wide set of divertor concepts and techniques; (iii) compatibility with bulk plasma performance; (iv) an upper bound of 500 M€ for the investment costs.
2017
The Divertor Tokamak Test facility proposal: Physical requirements and reference design / Crisanti, F.; Albanese, R.; Granucci, G.; Martone, R.; Sonato, P; Affinito, L.; Anemona, A.; Apicella, M. L.; Batistoni, P.; Calabrò, G.; Cardinali, A.; Ceccuzzi, S.; Centioli, C.; Corato, V.; Costa, P.; Cucchiaro, A.; Della Corte, A.; De Marzi, G.; Di Zenobio, A.; Fiamozzi Zignani, C.; Gabellieri, L.; Lampasi, A.; Maddaluno, G.; Maffia, G.; Marocco, D.; Mazzitelli, G.; Messina, G.; Mirizzi, F.; Moneti, M.; Muzzi, L.; Pizzuto, A.; Ramogida, G.; Ravera, G. L.; Righetti, R.; Roccella, S.; Starace, F.; Tomassetti, G.; Tuccillo, A.; Tudisco, O.; Turtù, S.; Villari, S.; Viola, B.; Vitale, V.; Vlad, G.; Zito, P.; Zonca, F.; Bruschi, A.; Farina, D.; Figini, L.; Garavaglia, S.; Lontano, M.; Micheletti, D.; Nowak, S.; Sozzi, C.; Ambrosino, R.; Barbato, L.; Ciattaglia, S.; Coccorese, D.; Coccorese, V.; de Magistris, M.; Di Gironimo, G.; Loschiavo, V. P.; Marzullo, D.; Mastrostefano, S.; Minucci, S.; Mozzillo, R.; Palmaccio, R.; Pericoli-Ridolfini, V.; Pironti, A.; Rubinacci, G.; Tarallo, A.; Ventre, S.; Villone, F.; Maggiora, R.; Milanesio, D.; Agostinetti, P.; Bolzonella, T.; Carraro, L.; Fassina, A.; Franz, P.; Gaio, E.; Gnesotto, F.; Innocente, P.; Luchetta, A.; Manduchi, G.; Marrelli, L.; Martin, P.; Peruzzo, S.; Piovan, R.; Puiatti, M. E.; Spizzo, G.; Scarin, P.; Spolaore, M.; Toigo, V.; Valisa, M.; Zanotto, L.; Gorini, G.; Giruzzi, G.; Duval, B.; Reimerdes, H.; de Baar, M.; Zagórski, R.. - In: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY. - ISSN 2352-1791. - 12:(2017), pp. 1330-1335. [10.1016/j.nme.2017.05.008]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/690032
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact