Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has been associated with lower number of graft anastomoses, lower rate of on-pump surgery, and higher graft patency rate as compared with angiography-guided CABG surgery. However, no clinical benefit has been reported to date.
Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery / Fournier, Stephane; Toth, Gabor G; De Bruyne, Bernard; Johnson, Nils P; Ciccarelli, Giovanni; Xaplanteris, Panagiotis; Milkas, Anastasios; Strisciuglio, Teresa; Bartunek, Jozef; Vanderheyden, Marc; Wyffels, Eric; Casselman, Filip; Van Praet, Frank; Stockman, Bernard; Degrieck, Ivan; Barbato, Emanuele. - In: CIRCULATION. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS. - ISSN 1941-7632. - 11:6(2018), p. e006368. [10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006368]
Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Strisciuglio, Teresa;Barbato, Emanuele
Conceptualization
2018
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has been associated with lower number of graft anastomoses, lower rate of on-pump surgery, and higher graft patency rate as compared with angiography-guided CABG surgery. However, no clinical benefit has been reported to date.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
