The European Structural Fund programs are embedded in a multi-level governance system, which has grown in parallel with European integration. Decision making power is increasingly delegated to territorial authorities with the assumption that local agents possess both contextual knowledge and political legitimacy to integrate different policy measures in a cooperative fashion. Within contexts with structural socioeconomic constraints, problems of coordination are associated with policy co-formulation, governance network management, meta-governance processes, and performance management and evaluation use. This paper aims to examine the variety of coordination mechanisms, which regional government agencies adopt to collaborate with local authorities to stimulate economically lagging territories. The paper analyzes management techniques of local organizational capacity and network building, project development, monitoring and evaluation, highlighting the rationale of regional development policies and the role of institutions. Building upon a two-year long (2006-2008) field research on local development programs in four regions of the South of Italy, this paper shows that cooperation co-exists with opportunistic behavior during program design and implementation, while bureaucratic culture and organizational weaknesses hamper managerial leadership and administrative decentralization. Findings highlight that centrally guided decentralization is a more sustainable capacity building strategy. Furthermore, perceived efficiency, equity, uncertainty, and relational quality shape coordination and its evolution over time. Interpersonal relations may increase to reduce uncertainty, or higher procedural formalization may ensure efficiency, equity and fair dealings. The evolution of coordination mechanisms has a bearing upon administrative capacity of public spending absorption against corruption and waste as well as on the potential for economic development and social cohesion.
What Coordination Mechanisms Work to Manage Regional Development Programs? Insights from Southern Italian Regions / Marra, Mita. - In: EUROPEAN URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES. - ISSN 0969-7764. - (2014), pp. 1-18. [10.1177/0969776412442766]
What Coordination Mechanisms Work to Manage Regional Development Programs? Insights from Southern Italian Regions
Mita Marra
2014
Abstract
The European Structural Fund programs are embedded in a multi-level governance system, which has grown in parallel with European integration. Decision making power is increasingly delegated to territorial authorities with the assumption that local agents possess both contextual knowledge and political legitimacy to integrate different policy measures in a cooperative fashion. Within contexts with structural socioeconomic constraints, problems of coordination are associated with policy co-formulation, governance network management, meta-governance processes, and performance management and evaluation use. This paper aims to examine the variety of coordination mechanisms, which regional government agencies adopt to collaborate with local authorities to stimulate economically lagging territories. The paper analyzes management techniques of local organizational capacity and network building, project development, monitoring and evaluation, highlighting the rationale of regional development policies and the role of institutions. Building upon a two-year long (2006-2008) field research on local development programs in four regions of the South of Italy, this paper shows that cooperation co-exists with opportunistic behavior during program design and implementation, while bureaucratic culture and organizational weaknesses hamper managerial leadership and administrative decentralization. Findings highlight that centrally guided decentralization is a more sustainable capacity building strategy. Furthermore, perceived efficiency, equity, uncertainty, and relational quality shape coordination and its evolution over time. Interpersonal relations may increase to reduce uncertainty, or higher procedural formalization may ensure efficiency, equity and fair dealings. The evolution of coordination mechanisms has a bearing upon administrative capacity of public spending absorption against corruption and waste as well as on the potential for economic development and social cohesion.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Marra European Journal of Urban and Regional Studies.pdf
non disponibili
Dimensione
167.63 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
167.63 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.