Background: Re-testing for GH secretion is needed to confirm the diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) after adult height achievement in childhood-onset GHD (COGHD).Aim: To define the cut-off of GH peak after retesting with GH-releasing hormone plus arginine (GHRHarg) in the diagnosis of permanent GHD in COGHD of different etiology.Patients and methods: Eighty-eight COGHD (median age 17.2 y), 29 idiopathic GHD (IGHD), 44 cancer survivors (TGHD) and 15 congenital GHD (CGHD) were enrolled in the study; 54 had isolated GHD (iGHD) and 34 had multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD). All were tested with insulin tolerance test (ITT) and GHRHarg. IGHD with a GH response to ITT >= 6 mu g/L were considered true negatives and served as the control group, and patients with a GH response <6 mu g/L as true positives. Baseline IGF-I was also measured. The diagnostic accuracy of GHRHarg testing and of IGF-I SDS in patients with GHD of different etiologies was evaluated by ROC analysis.Results: Forty-six subjects with a GH peak to ITT >= 6 mu g/L and 42 with GH peak <6 mu g/L showed a GH peak after GHRHarg between 8.8-124 mu g/L and 0.3-26.3 mu/L, respectively; 29 IGHD were true negatives, 42 were true positives and 17 with a high likelihood GHD showed a GH peak to ITT >= 6 mu g/L. ROC analysis based on the etiology indicated the best diagnostic accuracy for peak GH cutoffs after GHRHarg of 25.3 mu g/L in CGHD, 15.7 in TGHD, and 13.8 in MPHD, and for IGF-1 SDS at -2.1 in CGHD, -1.5 in TGHD, and -1.9 in MPHD.Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the best cut-off for GH peak after retesting with GHRHarg changes according to the etiology of GHD during the transition age. Based on these results the diagnostic accuracy of GHRHarg remains questionable.

Accuracy and Limitations of the Growth Hormone (GH) Releasing Hormone-Arginine Retesting in Young Adults With Childhood-Onset GH Deficiency / Patti, Giuseppa; Noli, Serena; Capalbo, Donatella; Allegri, Anna Maria Elsa; Napoli, Flavia; Cappa, Marco; Ubertini, Grazia Maria; Gallizia, Annalisa; Notarnicola, Sara; Ibba, Anastasia; Crocco, Marco; Parodi, Stefano; Salerno, Mariacarolina; Loche, Sandro; Garré, Maria Luisa; Tornari, Elena; Maghnie, Mohamad; Di Iorgi, Natascia. - In: FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY. - ISSN 1664-2392. - 10:(2019), p. 525. [10.3389/fendo.2019.00525]

Accuracy and Limitations of the Growth Hormone (GH) Releasing Hormone-Arginine Retesting in Young Adults With Childhood-Onset GH Deficiency

Capalbo, Donatella;Salerno, Mariacarolina;
2019

Abstract

Background: Re-testing for GH secretion is needed to confirm the diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) after adult height achievement in childhood-onset GHD (COGHD).Aim: To define the cut-off of GH peak after retesting with GH-releasing hormone plus arginine (GHRHarg) in the diagnosis of permanent GHD in COGHD of different etiology.Patients and methods: Eighty-eight COGHD (median age 17.2 y), 29 idiopathic GHD (IGHD), 44 cancer survivors (TGHD) and 15 congenital GHD (CGHD) were enrolled in the study; 54 had isolated GHD (iGHD) and 34 had multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD). All were tested with insulin tolerance test (ITT) and GHRHarg. IGHD with a GH response to ITT >= 6 mu g/L were considered true negatives and served as the control group, and patients with a GH response <6 mu g/L as true positives. Baseline IGF-I was also measured. The diagnostic accuracy of GHRHarg testing and of IGF-I SDS in patients with GHD of different etiologies was evaluated by ROC analysis.Results: Forty-six subjects with a GH peak to ITT >= 6 mu g/L and 42 with GH peak <6 mu g/L showed a GH peak after GHRHarg between 8.8-124 mu g/L and 0.3-26.3 mu/L, respectively; 29 IGHD were true negatives, 42 were true positives and 17 with a high likelihood GHD showed a GH peak to ITT >= 6 mu g/L. ROC analysis based on the etiology indicated the best diagnostic accuracy for peak GH cutoffs after GHRHarg of 25.3 mu g/L in CGHD, 15.7 in TGHD, and 13.8 in MPHD, and for IGF-1 SDS at -2.1 in CGHD, -1.5 in TGHD, and -1.9 in MPHD.Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the best cut-off for GH peak after retesting with GHRHarg changes according to the etiology of GHD during the transition age. Based on these results the diagnostic accuracy of GHRHarg remains questionable.
2019
Accuracy and Limitations of the Growth Hormone (GH) Releasing Hormone-Arginine Retesting in Young Adults With Childhood-Onset GH Deficiency / Patti, Giuseppa; Noli, Serena; Capalbo, Donatella; Allegri, Anna Maria Elsa; Napoli, Flavia; Cappa, Marco; Ubertini, Grazia Maria; Gallizia, Annalisa; Notarnicola, Sara; Ibba, Anastasia; Crocco, Marco; Parodi, Stefano; Salerno, Mariacarolina; Loche, Sandro; Garré, Maria Luisa; Tornari, Elena; Maghnie, Mohamad; Di Iorgi, Natascia. - In: FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY. - ISSN 1664-2392. - 10:(2019), p. 525. [10.3389/fendo.2019.00525]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/767609
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact