On September 25th the Supreme Court recognized, under certain conditions, the constitutional illegitimacy of article 580 c.p., the rule that punishes the conduct of those who facilitate suicide. By means of this judgment, the Court lays the foundations for a legislative recognition of active euthanasia. Starting from Seneca’s observations about suicide, the Author will question whether the right to die can be regulated by law and whether the recognition of individual freedom to decide to end one’s life really makes it necessary to recognize the lawfulness of medically assisted suicide.
Riflessioni sull’eutanasia. A margine della sentenza della Corte Costituzionale sull’art. 580 c.p / Guizzi, Giuseppe. - In: OSSERVATORIO DEL DIRITTO CIVILE E COMMERCIALE. - ISSN 2281-2628. - VII:2(2019), pp. 387-395.
Riflessioni sull’eutanasia. A margine della sentenza della Corte Costituzionale sull’art. 580 c.p.
Giuseppe Guizzi
2019
Abstract
On September 25th the Supreme Court recognized, under certain conditions, the constitutional illegitimacy of article 580 c.p., the rule that punishes the conduct of those who facilitate suicide. By means of this judgment, the Court lays the foundations for a legislative recognition of active euthanasia. Starting from Seneca’s observations about suicide, the Author will question whether the right to die can be regulated by law and whether the recognition of individual freedom to decide to end one’s life really makes it necessary to recognize the lawfulness of medically assisted suicide.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Guizzi- Sull'eutanasia (ODCC).pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
288.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
288.01 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.