The anaerobic digestion (AD) process is influenced by a variety of operation parameters, such as sludge rheology, mixing, temperature, solid retention time (SRT), hydraulic retention time (HRT) and solids concentration. The optimum in the mixing lies somewhere between no-mixing and continuous mixing, as the lack or excessive mixing can lead to poor AD performance instead. A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics steady/unsteady model, incorporating the rheological properties of the sludge, was developed and applied to quantify mixing in a full-scale anaerobic digester. Mechanical and gas mixing solutions were taken into account, keeping constant the daily energy consumption. Results, consisting of velocity magnitude and patterns, dead zone formation and turbulence levels were discussed. Compared to the mechanical mixing, gas mixing had lower percentage of dead zones (about 5% against 50%), larger maximum velocity (about 3 m/s against 1 m/s) as well as larger turbulent kinetic energy levels (0.24 m2/s2 against 0.001 m2/s2).

Analysis of anaerobic digester mixing: comparison of long shafted paddle mixing vs gas mixing / Gualtieri, C.; Meda, A.; Landi, A.; Coppola, S.; Viccione, G.; Bergamo, U.. - In: WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0273-1223. - 81:7(2020), pp. 1406-1419. [10.2166/wst.2020.248]

Analysis of anaerobic digester mixing: comparison of long shafted paddle mixing vs gas mixing

Gualtieri, C.
Supervision
;
2020

Abstract

The anaerobic digestion (AD) process is influenced by a variety of operation parameters, such as sludge rheology, mixing, temperature, solid retention time (SRT), hydraulic retention time (HRT) and solids concentration. The optimum in the mixing lies somewhere between no-mixing and continuous mixing, as the lack or excessive mixing can lead to poor AD performance instead. A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics steady/unsteady model, incorporating the rheological properties of the sludge, was developed and applied to quantify mixing in a full-scale anaerobic digester. Mechanical and gas mixing solutions were taken into account, keeping constant the daily energy consumption. Results, consisting of velocity magnitude and patterns, dead zone formation and turbulence levels were discussed. Compared to the mechanical mixing, gas mixing had lower percentage of dead zones (about 5% against 50%), larger maximum velocity (about 3 m/s against 1 m/s) as well as larger turbulent kinetic energy levels (0.24 m2/s2 against 0.001 m2/s2).
2020
Analysis of anaerobic digester mixing: comparison of long shafted paddle mixing vs gas mixing / Gualtieri, C.; Meda, A.; Landi, A.; Coppola, S.; Viccione, G.; Bergamo, U.. - In: WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0273-1223. - 81:7(2020), pp. 1406-1419. [10.2166/wst.2020.248]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
wst081071406.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 604.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
604.52 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/812405
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact