Purpose: To present the outcomes of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) resection from five Italian centres, focussing the analysis on the comparison among open (OG), laparoscopic (LG) and robotic (RG) approaches. Methods: All consecutive gastric wedge resections for GIST between 2009 and 2019 were included. Results: In total 101 (OG = 14, LG = 63 and RG = 24) were included. No differences were seen in the preoperative characteristics among the groups. Robotic procedures were longer (RG 180 min vs. LG 100 vs. OG 110; p < 0.0001). Time-to-first flatus and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in the OG group. Complication rates were similar among the groups. A sub-analysis on minimally invasive (RG = 19 vs. LG = 20) wedge resections and hand/robot-sewn suture showed that operative time was longer in the RGs (p = 0.007). No conversions were recorded in the RG group versus three in the LG group (p = 0.231). Safety-related factors were similar. Conclusions: Gastric GIST can be safely treated with a minimally invasive approach which is also associated with improved postoperative outcomes.
Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumour resections: A multicentre cohort study / Solaini, L.; Cavaliere, D.; Fico, V.; Milone, M.; De Pascale, S.; Desiderio, J.; Vitali, G.; Parisi, A.; Fumagalli Romario, U.; De Palma, G. D.; D'Ugo, D.; Ercolani, G.. - In: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY. - ISSN 1478-5951. - 17:2(2021). [10.1002/rcs.2198]
Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumour resections: A multicentre cohort study
Cavaliere D.;Fico V.;Milone M.;Desiderio J.;De Palma G. D.;
2021
Abstract
Purpose: To present the outcomes of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) resection from five Italian centres, focussing the analysis on the comparison among open (OG), laparoscopic (LG) and robotic (RG) approaches. Methods: All consecutive gastric wedge resections for GIST between 2009 and 2019 were included. Results: In total 101 (OG = 14, LG = 63 and RG = 24) were included. No differences were seen in the preoperative characteristics among the groups. Robotic procedures were longer (RG 180 min vs. LG 100 vs. OG 110; p < 0.0001). Time-to-first flatus and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in the OG group. Complication rates were similar among the groups. A sub-analysis on minimally invasive (RG = 19 vs. LG = 20) wedge resections and hand/robot-sewn suture showed that operative time was longer in the RGs (p = 0.007). No conversions were recorded in the RG group versus three in the LG group (p = 0.231). Safety-related factors were similar. Conclusions: Gastric GIST can be safely treated with a minimally invasive approach which is also associated with improved postoperative outcomes.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
