This paper proposes a feasibility study concerning a large turboprop aircraft to be used as a lower environmental impact solution to current regional jets operated on short/medium hauls. An overview of this market scenario highlights that this segment is evenly shared between regional turboprop and jet aircraft. Although regional jets ensure a large operative flexibility, they are usually not optimized for short missions with a negative effect on block fuel and environmental impact. Conversely, turboprops represent a greener solution but with reduced passenger capacity and speed. Those aspects highlight a slot for a new turboprop platform coupling higher seat capacity, cruise speed and design range with a reduced fuel consumption. This platform should operate on those ranges where neither jet aircraft nor existing turboprops are optimized. This work compares three different solutions: a high‐wing layout with under‐wing engines installation and both two-and three‐lifting‐surface configurations with low‐wing and tail tips‐mounted engines. For each concept, a multi‐disciplinary optimization was performed targeting the minimum block fuel on a 1600 NM mission. Optimum solutions were compared with both a regional jet such as the Airbus A220‐300 operated on 1600 NM and with a jet aircraft specifically designed for this range.
Design and optimization of a large turboprop aircraft / Nicolosi, F.; Corcione, S.; Trifari, V.; De Marco, A.. - In: AEROSPACE. - ISSN 2226-4310. - 8:5(2021), pp. 1-26. [10.3390/aerospace8050132]
Design and optimization of a large turboprop aircraft
Nicolosi F.
Primo
;Corcione S.;Trifari V.;De Marco A.
2021
Abstract
This paper proposes a feasibility study concerning a large turboprop aircraft to be used as a lower environmental impact solution to current regional jets operated on short/medium hauls. An overview of this market scenario highlights that this segment is evenly shared between regional turboprop and jet aircraft. Although regional jets ensure a large operative flexibility, they are usually not optimized for short missions with a negative effect on block fuel and environmental impact. Conversely, turboprops represent a greener solution but with reduced passenger capacity and speed. Those aspects highlight a slot for a new turboprop platform coupling higher seat capacity, cruise speed and design range with a reduced fuel consumption. This platform should operate on those ranges where neither jet aircraft nor existing turboprops are optimized. This work compares three different solutions: a high‐wing layout with under‐wing engines installation and both two-and three‐lifting‐surface configurations with low‐wing and tail tips‐mounted engines. For each concept, a multi‐disciplinary optimization was performed targeting the minimum block fuel on a 1600 NM mission. Optimum solutions were compared with both a regional jet such as the Airbus A220‐300 operated on 1600 NM and with a jet aircraft specifically designed for this range.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
14_(2021)_Aerospace-08-00132.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo print finale
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
6.54 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.54 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.