: We systematically reviewed QoL assessment and reporting in RCTs of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in solid cancers published between 2013 and 2021. None of the 106 eligible trials included QoL among primary endpoints. QoL results were non-disclosed in 83/106 (78.3%) primary publications. QoL assessment was disclosed exclusively in study protocol and not in methods of the manuscript in 48.5% of publications. In 27.8% of articles, QoL assessment was disclosed in the methods but non-reported among the results. Only in 44.3% of trials missing QoL results in primary manuscripts, QoL data were reported in a secondary publication. A relevant delay occurred in secondary publications, with a median time to secondary articles with QoL results of 33.6 months. Our analysis revealed a significant underreporting of QoL in RCTs of ICIs in solid cancers. Altogether, absent or delayed disclosure of QoL results affect a complete evaluation of clinical benefit of new anticancer treatments.
Inadequate health-related quality of life assessment and reporting in phase III clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid cancers: a systematic review / Servetto, Alberto; Salomone, Fabio; Di Costanzo, Fabrizio; Iuliano, Rossella; Marandino, Laura; Napolitano, Fabiana; Santaniello, Antonio; De Placido, Pietro; De Placido, Sabino; Di Maio, Massimo; Formisano, Luigi; Bianco, Roberto. - In: CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1040-8428. - (2022), p. 103649. [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103649]
Inadequate health-related quality of life assessment and reporting in phase III clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid cancers: a systematic review
Servetto, AlbertoPrimo
;Salomone, Fabio;Di Costanzo, Fabrizio;Iuliano, Rossella;Marandino, Laura;Napolitano, Fabiana;Santaniello, Antonio;De Placido, Pietro;De Placido, Sabino;Formisano, Luigi
;Bianco, Roberto
2022
Abstract
: We systematically reviewed QoL assessment and reporting in RCTs of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in solid cancers published between 2013 and 2021. None of the 106 eligible trials included QoL among primary endpoints. QoL results were non-disclosed in 83/106 (78.3%) primary publications. QoL assessment was disclosed exclusively in study protocol and not in methods of the manuscript in 48.5% of publications. In 27.8% of articles, QoL assessment was disclosed in the methods but non-reported among the results. Only in 44.3% of trials missing QoL results in primary manuscripts, QoL data were reported in a secondary publication. A relevant delay occurred in secondary publications, with a median time to secondary articles with QoL results of 33.6 months. Our analysis revealed a significant underreporting of QoL in RCTs of ICIs in solid cancers. Altogether, absent or delayed disclosure of QoL results affect a complete evaluation of clinical benefit of new anticancer treatments.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S1040842822000737-main.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.32 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.32 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.