Estimating small-scale VP/VS variations at depth can be a powerful tool to infer lithology and hydration of a rock, with possible implications for frictional behavior. In principle, from the differential arrival times of P and S phases from a set of spatially clustered earthquakes, an estimate of the local VP/VS can be extracted, because the VP/VS is the scaling factor between the P and S differential times for each pair of earthquakes. We critically review the technique proposed by Lin and Shearer (2007), in which the mean value over all stations is subtracted from the differential arrival times of each pair of events in order to make the method independent of a priori information on origin times. The demeaned differential P and S arrival times are plotted on a plane, and the VP/VS ratio is estimated by fitting the points on this plane. We tested the method by both theoretical analysis and numerical simulations of P and S travel times in several velocity models. We found that the method returns exact values of VP/VS only in the case of a medium with homogeneous VP/VS , whereas, when a VP/VS gradient is present, the estimates are biased as an effect of systematic differences between P and S takeoff angles. We demonstrated that this bias arises from the demeaning of the arrival times over the stations. In layered models with VP/VS decreasing with depth, we found that VP/VS is overestimated or underestimated, respectively, for takeoff angles larger or smaller than 90°. In mosst realistic local earthquake monitoring settings, the take-off angles are not equally distributed but there will be a dominance of downward going rays, resulting in an overall bias. We calculated analytically the dependence of this bias on the takeoff angles. Additional simulations showed that the difference between the calculated and the expected VP/VS is reduced for simple horizontally layered velocity structures (<0.06), whereas it is 0.27 in a more realistic velocity model mimicking a subduction zone.
Applicability and bias of VP/VS estimates by P and S differential arrival times of spatially clustered earthquakes - why the method of Lin and Shearer (2007) will yield biased results in nearly all realistic configurations / Tilmann, F; Palo, M; Schurr, B. - (2016). (Intervento presentato al convegno American Geophysical Union – Fall Meeting 2016 tenutosi a San Francisco, USA nel 12-16 dicembre 2016).
Applicability and bias of VP/VS estimates by P and S differential arrival times of spatially clustered earthquakes - why the method of Lin and Shearer (2007) will yield biased results in nearly all realistic configurations
PALO M;
2016
Abstract
Estimating small-scale VP/VS variations at depth can be a powerful tool to infer lithology and hydration of a rock, with possible implications for frictional behavior. In principle, from the differential arrival times of P and S phases from a set of spatially clustered earthquakes, an estimate of the local VP/VS can be extracted, because the VP/VS is the scaling factor between the P and S differential times for each pair of earthquakes. We critically review the technique proposed by Lin and Shearer (2007), in which the mean value over all stations is subtracted from the differential arrival times of each pair of events in order to make the method independent of a priori information on origin times. The demeaned differential P and S arrival times are plotted on a plane, and the VP/VS ratio is estimated by fitting the points on this plane. We tested the method by both theoretical analysis and numerical simulations of P and S travel times in several velocity models. We found that the method returns exact values of VP/VS only in the case of a medium with homogeneous VP/VS , whereas, when a VP/VS gradient is present, the estimates are biased as an effect of systematic differences between P and S takeoff angles. We demonstrated that this bias arises from the demeaning of the arrival times over the stations. In layered models with VP/VS decreasing with depth, we found that VP/VS is overestimated or underestimated, respectively, for takeoff angles larger or smaller than 90°. In mosst realistic local earthquake monitoring settings, the take-off angles are not equally distributed but there will be a dominance of downward going rays, resulting in an overall bias. We calculated analytically the dependence of this bias on the takeoff angles. Additional simulations showed that the difference between the calculated and the expected VP/VS is reduced for simple horizontally layered velocity structures (<0.06), whereas it is 0.27 in a more realistic velocity model mimicking a subduction zone.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
