Purpose – The paper aims at enriching current debate about human-technology dichotomy in socio-economic settings by decoding and systematizing the main phases through which it has been approached in managerial and social studies. Design/methodology/approach – A multi-interpretative framework is built thanks to the adoption of a qualitative approach inspired by the inductive logic and it is sed for analyzing the historical evolution of the approach to human-technology dichotomy and for explaining them through an innovative conceptual model. Findings – An innovative conceptual model is proposed for depicting connections and evolutions among the main four phases in the evolution of the approaches to human-technology dichotomy. Research implications – Reflections and conceptual model herein can support researchers in rereading the multiple theoretical and practical contributions provided with reference to human and technology relations in socio-economic settings. Practical implications – The paper can support managers and entrepreneurs in defining and evaluating managerial approaches for efficiently enhancing human-technology interaction. Value – The paper proposes an innovative conceptual model based on a multi-interpretative framework for decoding the historical evolution of the approaches to human-technology dichotomy in business settings. New variables are added to the current debate about the topic for building an original interpretive viewpoint.

Human-technology dichotomy in shaping management history / Caputo, Francesco; Sepe, Fabiana; Di Taranto, Enrico; Fiano, Fabio. - In: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT HISTORY. - ISSN 1758-7751. - 30:2(2024), pp. 147-165. [10.1108/JMH-12-2022-0083]

Human-technology dichotomy in shaping management history

Caputo, Francesco
;
Sepe, Fabiana;Di Taranto, Enrico;
2024

Abstract

Purpose – The paper aims at enriching current debate about human-technology dichotomy in socio-economic settings by decoding and systematizing the main phases through which it has been approached in managerial and social studies. Design/methodology/approach – A multi-interpretative framework is built thanks to the adoption of a qualitative approach inspired by the inductive logic and it is sed for analyzing the historical evolution of the approach to human-technology dichotomy and for explaining them through an innovative conceptual model. Findings – An innovative conceptual model is proposed for depicting connections and evolutions among the main four phases in the evolution of the approaches to human-technology dichotomy. Research implications – Reflections and conceptual model herein can support researchers in rereading the multiple theoretical and practical contributions provided with reference to human and technology relations in socio-economic settings. Practical implications – The paper can support managers and entrepreneurs in defining and evaluating managerial approaches for efficiently enhancing human-technology interaction. Value – The paper proposes an innovative conceptual model based on a multi-interpretative framework for decoding the historical evolution of the approaches to human-technology dichotomy in business settings. New variables are added to the current debate about the topic for building an original interpretive viewpoint.
2024
Human-technology dichotomy in shaping management history / Caputo, Francesco; Sepe, Fabiana; Di Taranto, Enrico; Fiano, Fabio. - In: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT HISTORY. - ISSN 1758-7751. - 30:2(2024), pp. 147-165. [10.1108/JMH-12-2022-0083]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10-1108_JMH-12-2022-0083.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 248.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
248.59 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/922108
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact