Purpose: To propose a new quality scoring tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), to assess and improve research quality of radiomics studies. Methods: We conducted an online modified Delphi study with a group of international experts. It was performed in three consecutive stages: Stage#1, item preparation; Stage#2, panel discussion among EuSoMII Auditing Group members to identify the items to be voted; and Stage#3, four rounds of the modified Delphi exercise by panelists to determine the items eligible for the METRICS and their weights. The consensus threshold was 75%. Based on the median ranks derived from expert panel opinion and their rank-sum based conversion to importance scores, the category and item weights were calculated. Result: In total, 59 panelists from 19 countries participated in selection and ranking of the items and categories. Final METRICS tool included 30 items within 9 categories. According to their weights, the categories were in descending order of importance: study design, imaging data, image processing and feature extraction, metrics and comparison, testing, feature processing, preparation for modeling, segmentation, and open science. A web application and a repository were developed to streamline the calculation of the METRICS score and to collect feedback from the radiomics community. Conclusion: In this work, we developed a scoring tool for assessing the methodological quality of the radiomics research, with a large international panel and a modified Delphi protocol. With its conditional format to cover methodological variations, it provides a well-constructed framework for the key methodological concepts to assess the quality of radiomic research papers. Critical relevance statement: A quality assessment tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), is made available by a large group of international domain experts, with transparent methodology, aiming at evaluating and improving research quality in radiomics and machine learning. Key points: • A methodological scoring tool, METRICS, was developed for assessing the quality of radiomics research, with a large international expert panel and a modified Delphi protocol. • The proposed scoring tool presents expert opinion-based importance weights of categories and items with a transparent methodology for the first time. • METRICS accounts for varying use cases, from handcrafted radiomics to entirely deep learning-based pipelines. • A web application has been developed to help with the calculation of the METRICS score ( https://metricsscore.github.io/metrics/METRICS.html ) and a repository created to collect feedback from the radiomics community ( https://github.com/metricsscore/metrics ).

METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII / Kocak, Burak; Akinci D’Antonoli, Tugba; Mercaldo, Nathaniel; Alberich-Bayarri, Angel; Baessler, Bettina; Ambrosini, Ilaria; Andreychenko, Anna E.; Bakas, Spyridon; Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.; Bressem, Keno; Buvat, Irene; Cannella, Roberto; Cappellini, Luca Alessandro; Cavallo, Armando Ugo; Chepelev, Leonid L.; Chu, Linda Chi Hang; Demircioglu, Aydin; Desouza, Nandita M.; Dietzel, Matthias; Fanni, Salvatore Claudio; Fedorov, Andrey; Fournier, Laure S.; Giannini, Valentina; Girometti, Rossano; Groot Lipman, Kevin B. W.; Kalarakis, Georgios; Kelly, Brendan S.; Klontzas, Michail E.; Koh, Dow-Mu; Kotter, Elmar; Lee, Ho Yun; Maas, Mario; Marti-Bonmati, Luis; Müller, Henning; Obuchowski, Nancy; Orlhac, Fanny; Papanikolaou, Nikolaos; Petrash, Ekaterina; Pfaehler, Elisabeth; Pinto dos Santos, Daniel; Ponsiglione, Andrea; Sabater, Sebastià; Sardanelli, Francesco; Seeböck, Philipp; Sijtsema, Nanna M.; Stanzione, Arnaldo; Traverso, Alberto; Ugga, Lorenzo; Vallières, Martin; van Dijk, Lisanne V.; van Griethuysen, Joost J. M.; van Hamersvelt, Robbert W.; van Ooijen, Peter; Vernuccio, Federica; Wang, Alan; Williams, Stuart; Witowski, Jan; Zhang, Zhongyi; Zwanenburg, Alex; Cuocolo, Renato. - In: INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING. - ISSN 1869-4101. - 15:1(2024), p. 8. [10.1186/s13244-023-01572-w]

METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII

Ponsiglione, Andrea;Stanzione, Arnaldo;Ugga, Lorenzo;
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To propose a new quality scoring tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), to assess and improve research quality of radiomics studies. Methods: We conducted an online modified Delphi study with a group of international experts. It was performed in three consecutive stages: Stage#1, item preparation; Stage#2, panel discussion among EuSoMII Auditing Group members to identify the items to be voted; and Stage#3, four rounds of the modified Delphi exercise by panelists to determine the items eligible for the METRICS and their weights. The consensus threshold was 75%. Based on the median ranks derived from expert panel opinion and their rank-sum based conversion to importance scores, the category and item weights were calculated. Result: In total, 59 panelists from 19 countries participated in selection and ranking of the items and categories. Final METRICS tool included 30 items within 9 categories. According to their weights, the categories were in descending order of importance: study design, imaging data, image processing and feature extraction, metrics and comparison, testing, feature processing, preparation for modeling, segmentation, and open science. A web application and a repository were developed to streamline the calculation of the METRICS score and to collect feedback from the radiomics community. Conclusion: In this work, we developed a scoring tool for assessing the methodological quality of the radiomics research, with a large international panel and a modified Delphi protocol. With its conditional format to cover methodological variations, it provides a well-constructed framework for the key methodological concepts to assess the quality of radiomic research papers. Critical relevance statement: A quality assessment tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), is made available by a large group of international domain experts, with transparent methodology, aiming at evaluating and improving research quality in radiomics and machine learning. Key points: • A methodological scoring tool, METRICS, was developed for assessing the quality of radiomics research, with a large international expert panel and a modified Delphi protocol. • The proposed scoring tool presents expert opinion-based importance weights of categories and items with a transparent methodology for the first time. • METRICS accounts for varying use cases, from handcrafted radiomics to entirely deep learning-based pipelines. • A web application has been developed to help with the calculation of the METRICS score ( https://metricsscore.github.io/metrics/METRICS.html ) and a repository created to collect feedback from the radiomics community ( https://github.com/metricsscore/metrics ).
2024
METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII / Kocak, Burak; Akinci D’Antonoli, Tugba; Mercaldo, Nathaniel; Alberich-Bayarri, Angel; Baessler, Bettina; Ambrosini, Ilaria; Andreychenko, Anna E.; Bakas, Spyridon; Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.; Bressem, Keno; Buvat, Irene; Cannella, Roberto; Cappellini, Luca Alessandro; Cavallo, Armando Ugo; Chepelev, Leonid L.; Chu, Linda Chi Hang; Demircioglu, Aydin; Desouza, Nandita M.; Dietzel, Matthias; Fanni, Salvatore Claudio; Fedorov, Andrey; Fournier, Laure S.; Giannini, Valentina; Girometti, Rossano; Groot Lipman, Kevin B. W.; Kalarakis, Georgios; Kelly, Brendan S.; Klontzas, Michail E.; Koh, Dow-Mu; Kotter, Elmar; Lee, Ho Yun; Maas, Mario; Marti-Bonmati, Luis; Müller, Henning; Obuchowski, Nancy; Orlhac, Fanny; Papanikolaou, Nikolaos; Petrash, Ekaterina; Pfaehler, Elisabeth; Pinto dos Santos, Daniel; Ponsiglione, Andrea; Sabater, Sebastià; Sardanelli, Francesco; Seeböck, Philipp; Sijtsema, Nanna M.; Stanzione, Arnaldo; Traverso, Alberto; Ugga, Lorenzo; Vallières, Martin; van Dijk, Lisanne V.; van Griethuysen, Joost J. M.; van Hamersvelt, Robbert W.; van Ooijen, Peter; Vernuccio, Federica; Wang, Alan; Williams, Stuart; Witowski, Jan; Zhang, Zhongyi; Zwanenburg, Alex; Cuocolo, Renato. - In: INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING. - ISSN 1869-4101. - 15:1(2024), p. 8. [10.1186/s13244-023-01572-w]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/952664
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 79
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 65
social impact