Background: The Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey to understand better how different echocardiographic modalities are used and accessed in Italy. Methods: We analyzed echocardiography laboratory activities over a month (November 2022). Data were retrieved via an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire, uploaded on the SIECVI website. Results: Data were obtained from 228 echocardiographic laboratories: 112 centers (49%) in the northern, 43 centers (19%) in the central, and 73 (32%) in the southern regions. During the month of observation, we collected 101,050 transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examinations performed in all centers. As concern other modalities there were performed 5497 transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations in 161/228 centers (71%); 4057 stress echocardiography (SE) examinations in 179/228 centers (79%); and examinations with ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in 151/228 centers (66%). We did not find significant regional variations between the different modalities. The usage of picture archiving and communication system (PACS) was significantly higher in the northern (84%) versus central (49%) and southern (45%) centers (P < 0.001). Lung ultrasound (LUS) was performed in 154 centers (66%), without difference between cardiology and noncardiology centers. The evaluation of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was evaluated mainly using the qualitative method in 223 centers (94%), occasionally with the Simpson method in 193 centers (85%), and with selective use of the three-dimensional (3D) method in only 23 centers (10%). 3D TTE was present in 137 centers (70%), and 3D TEE in all centers where TEE was done (71%). The assessment of LV diastolic function was done routinely in 80% of the centers. Right ventricular function was evaluated using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in all centers, using tricuspid valve annular systolic velocity by tissue Doppler imaging in 53% of the centers, and using fractional area change in 33% of the centers. When we divided into cardiology (179, 78%) and noncardiology (49, 22%) centers, we found significant differences in the SE (93% vs. 26%, P < 0.001), TEE (85% vs. 18%), UCA (67% vs. 43%, P < 0001), and STE (87% vs. 20%, P < 0.001). The incidence of LUS evaluation was similar between the cardiology and noncardiology centers (69% vs. 61%, P = NS). Conclusions: This nationwide survey demonstrated that digital infrastructures and advanced echocardiography modalities, such as 3D and STE, are widely available in Italy with a notable diffuse uptake of LUS in the core TTE examination, a suboptimal diffusion of PACS recording, and conservative use of UCA, 3D, and strain. There are significant differences between northern and central-southern regions and echocardiographic laboratories that pertain to the cardiac unit. This inhomogeneous distribution of technology represents one of the main issues that must be solved to standardize the practice of echocardiography.
Organization and Activity of Italian Echocardiographic Laboratories: A Survey of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging / Ciampi, Quirino; Pepi, Mauro; Antonini-Canterin, Francesco; Barbieri, Andrea; Barchitta, Agata; Faganello, Giorgio; Miceli, Sofia; Parato, Vito Maurizio; Tota, Antonio; Trocino, Giuseppe; Abbate, Massimiliana; Accadia, Maria; Alemanni, Rossella; Angelini, Andrea; Anglano, Francesco; Anselmi, Maurizio; Aquila, Iolanda; Aramu, Simona; Avogadri, Enrico; Azzaro, Giuseppe; Badano, Luigi; Balducci, Anna; Ballocca, Flavia; Barbarossa, Alessandro; Barbati, Giovanni; Barletta, Valentina; Barone, Daniele; Becherini, Francesco; Benfari, Giovanni; Beraldi, Monica; Bergandi, Gianluigi; Bilardo, Giuseppe; Binno, Simone Maurizio; Bolognesi, Massimo; Bongiovi, Stefano; Bragato, Renato Maria; Braggion, Gabriele; Brancaleoni, Rossella; Bursi, Francesca; Dessalvi, Christian Cadeddu; Cameli, Matteo; Canu, Antonella; Capitelli, Mariano; Capra, Anna Clara Maria; Carbonara, Rosa; Carbone, Maria; Carbonella, Marco; Carrabba, Nazario; Casavecchia, Grazia; Casula, Margherita; Chesi, Elena; Cicco, Sebastiano; Citro, Rodolfo; Cocchia, Rosangela; Colombo, Barbara Maria; Colonna, Paolo; Conte, Maddalena; Corrado, Giovanni; Cortesi, Pietro; Cortigiani, Lauro; Costantino, Marco Fabio; Cozza, Fabiana; Cucchini, Umberto; D'Angelo, Myriam; Ros, Santina Da; D'Andrea, Fabrizio; D'Andrea, Antonello; D'Auria, Francesca; De Caridi, Giovanni; De Feo, Stefania; De Matteis, Giovanni Maria; De Vecchi, Simona; Giudice, Carmen Del; Dell'Angela, Luca; Paoli, Lucrezia Delli; Dentamaro, Ilaria; Destefanis, Paola; Di Fulvio, Maria; Di Gaetano, Renato; Di Giannuario, Giovanna; Di Gioia, Angelo; Di Martino, Luigi Flavio Massimiliano; Di Muro, Carmine; Di Nora, Concetta; Di Salvo, Giovanni; Dodi, Claudio; Dogliani, Sarah; Donati, Federica; Dottori, Melissa; Epifani, Giuseppe; Fabiani, Iacopo; Ferrara, Francesca; Ferrara, Luigi; Ferrua, Stefania; Filice, Gemma; Fiorino, Maria; Forno, Davide; Garini, Alberto; Giarratana, Gioachino Agostino; Gigantino, Giuseppe; Giorgi, Mauro; Giubertoni, Elisa; Greco, Cosimo Angelo; Grigolato, Michele; Marra, Walter Grosso; Holzl, Anna; Iaiza, Alessandra; Iannaccone, Andrea; Ilardi, Federica; Imbalzano, Egidio; Inciardi, Riccardo; Inserra, Corinna Antonia; Iori, Emilio; Izzo, Annibale; Rosa, Giuseppe La; Labanti, Graziana; Lanzone, Alberto Maria; Lanzoni, Laura; Lapetina, Ornella; Leiballi, Elisa; Librera, Mariateresa; Conte, Carmenita Lo; Monaco, Maria Lo; Lombardo, Antonella; Luciani, Michelangelo; Lusardi, Paola; Magnante, Antonio; Malagoli, Alessandro; Malatesta, Gelsomina; Mancusi, Costantino; Manes, Maria Teresa; Manganelli, Fiore; Mantovani, Francesca; Manuppelli, Vincenzo; Marchese, Valeria; Marinacci, Lina; Mattioli, Roberto; Maurizio, Civelli; Mazza, Giuseppe Antonio; Mazza, Stefano; Melis, Marco; Meloni, Giulia; Merli, Elisa; Milan, Alberto; Minardi, Giovanni; Monaco, Antonella; Monte, Ines; Montresor, Graziano; Moreo, Antonella; Mori, Fabio; Morini, Sofia; Moro, Claudio; Morrone, Doralisa; Negri, Francesco; Nipote, Carmelo; Nisi, Fulvio; Nocco, Silvio; Novello, Luigi; Nunziata, Luigi; Perini, Alessandro Paoletti; Parodi, Antonello; Pasanisi, Emilio Maria; Pastorini, Guido; Pavasini, Rita; Pavoni, Daisy; Pedone, Chiara; Pelliccia, Francesco; Pelliciari, Giovanni; Pelloni, Elisa; Pergola, Valeria; Perillo, Giovanni; Petruccelli, Enrica; Pezzullo, Chiara; Piacentini, Gerardo; Picardi, Elisa; Pinna, Giovanni; Pizzarelli, Massimiliano; Pizzuti, Alfredo; Poggi, Matteo Maria; Posteraro, Alfredo; Privitera, Carmen; Rampazzo, Debora; Ratti, Carlo; Rettegno, Sara; Ricci, Fabrizio; Ricci, Caterina; Rolando, Cristina; Rossi, Stefania; Rovera, Chiara; Ruggieri, Roberta; Russo, Maria Giovanna; Sacchi, Nicola; Saladino, Antonino; Sani, Francesca; Sartori, Chiara; Scarabeo, Virginia; Sciacqua, Angela; Scillone, Antonio; Scopelliti, Pasquale Antonio; Scorza, Alfredo; Scozzafava, Angela; Serafini, Francesco; Serra, Walter; Severino, Sergio; Simeone, Beatrice; Sirico, Domenico; Solari, Marco; Spadaro, Gian Luca; Stefani, Laura; Strangio, Antonio; Surace, Francesca Chiara; Tamborini, Gloria; Tarquinio, Nicola; Tassone, Eliezer Joseph; Tavarozzi, Isabella; Tchana, Bertrand; Tedesco, Giuseppe; Tinto, Monica; Torzillo, Daniela; Totaro, Antonio; Triolo, Oreste Fabio; Troisi, Federica; Tusa, Maurizio; Vancheri, Federico; Varasano, Vincenzo; Venezia, Amedeo; Vermi, Anna Chiara; Villari, Bruno; Zampi, Giordano; Zannoni, Jessica; Zito, Concetta; Zugaro, Antonello; Di Bella, Gianluca; Carerj, Scipione. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ECHOGRAPHY. - ISSN 2211-4122. - 33:1(2023). [10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_16_23]
Organization and Activity of Italian Echocardiographic Laboratories: A Survey of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging
Barbieri, Andrea;Barbati, Giovanni;Barletta, Valentina;Conte, Maddalena;D'Andrea, Fabrizio;Ferrara, Francesca;Ilardi, Federica;Mancusi, Costantino;Manganelli, Fiore;Marchese, Valeria;Monaco, Antonella;Nunziata, Luigi;Pinna, Giovanni;Ratti, Carlo;Ricci, Fabrizio;Sciacqua, Angela;Sirico, Domenico;Totaro, Antonio;
2023
Abstract
Background: The Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey to understand better how different echocardiographic modalities are used and accessed in Italy. Methods: We analyzed echocardiography laboratory activities over a month (November 2022). Data were retrieved via an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire, uploaded on the SIECVI website. Results: Data were obtained from 228 echocardiographic laboratories: 112 centers (49%) in the northern, 43 centers (19%) in the central, and 73 (32%) in the southern regions. During the month of observation, we collected 101,050 transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examinations performed in all centers. As concern other modalities there were performed 5497 transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations in 161/228 centers (71%); 4057 stress echocardiography (SE) examinations in 179/228 centers (79%); and examinations with ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in 151/228 centers (66%). We did not find significant regional variations between the different modalities. The usage of picture archiving and communication system (PACS) was significantly higher in the northern (84%) versus central (49%) and southern (45%) centers (P < 0.001). Lung ultrasound (LUS) was performed in 154 centers (66%), without difference between cardiology and noncardiology centers. The evaluation of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was evaluated mainly using the qualitative method in 223 centers (94%), occasionally with the Simpson method in 193 centers (85%), and with selective use of the three-dimensional (3D) method in only 23 centers (10%). 3D TTE was present in 137 centers (70%), and 3D TEE in all centers where TEE was done (71%). The assessment of LV diastolic function was done routinely in 80% of the centers. Right ventricular function was evaluated using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in all centers, using tricuspid valve annular systolic velocity by tissue Doppler imaging in 53% of the centers, and using fractional area change in 33% of the centers. When we divided into cardiology (179, 78%) and noncardiology (49, 22%) centers, we found significant differences in the SE (93% vs. 26%, P < 0.001), TEE (85% vs. 18%), UCA (67% vs. 43%, P < 0001), and STE (87% vs. 20%, P < 0.001). The incidence of LUS evaluation was similar between the cardiology and noncardiology centers (69% vs. 61%, P = NS). Conclusions: This nationwide survey demonstrated that digital infrastructures and advanced echocardiography modalities, such as 3D and STE, are widely available in Italy with a notable diffuse uptake of LUS in the core TTE examination, a suboptimal diffusion of PACS recording, and conservative use of UCA, 3D, and strain. There are significant differences between northern and central-southern regions and echocardiographic laboratories that pertain to the cardiac unit. This inhomogeneous distribution of technology represents one of the main issues that must be solved to standardize the practice of echocardiography.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
