Background: Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) has become the gold standard for mild and moderate stages to stop the progression of keratoconus. We analyzed some corneal topography indices to compare iontophoresis epi-on and iontophoresis epi-off techniques throughout a two-year follow-up. Methods: A total of 64 eyes of 49 patients who underwent CXL were recruited. In 30 eyes the epi-off technique was performed, whereas the remaining 34 eyes were treated with the epi-on technique. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination that included CDVA, central and thinnest corneal thickness, Schirmer test I, TBUT test, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Results: In both groups, a significant improvement in visual function was recorded. No statistically significant differences between Kmax, Mean K, Flat K, Steep K values were found. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the epi-on and epi-off groups’ pachymetry before and after 24 months follow-up as well as between the epi-on and epi-off groups’ topographically thinnest point in the immediate post-surgery and 24 months after surgery were recorded. Conclusion: Our study highlighted that both techniques are valid in mid-term corneal stabilization. The advantage of the new iontophoresis epi-off cross-linking technique could be found in a faster imbibing time of the cornea, therefore reducing surgical times, with a lower risk of complications.

Topographic Outcomes in Keratoconus Surgery: Epi-on versus Epi-off Iontophoresis Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking / Napolitano, Pasquale; Tranfa, Fausto; D'Andrea, Luca; Caruso, Ciro; Rinaldi, Michele; Mazzucco, Alberto; Ciampa, Nicola; Melenzane, Antonietta; Costagliola, Ciro. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 11:7(2022), p. 1785. [10.3390/jcm11071785]

Topographic Outcomes in Keratoconus Surgery: Epi-on versus Epi-off Iontophoresis Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking

Tranfa, Fausto;D'Andrea, Luca
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Rinaldi, Michele;Mazzucco, Alberto;Ciampa, Nicola;Melenzane, Antonietta;Costagliola, Ciro
2022

Abstract

Background: Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) has become the gold standard for mild and moderate stages to stop the progression of keratoconus. We analyzed some corneal topography indices to compare iontophoresis epi-on and iontophoresis epi-off techniques throughout a two-year follow-up. Methods: A total of 64 eyes of 49 patients who underwent CXL were recruited. In 30 eyes the epi-off technique was performed, whereas the remaining 34 eyes were treated with the epi-on technique. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination that included CDVA, central and thinnest corneal thickness, Schirmer test I, TBUT test, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Results: In both groups, a significant improvement in visual function was recorded. No statistically significant differences between Kmax, Mean K, Flat K, Steep K values were found. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the epi-on and epi-off groups’ pachymetry before and after 24 months follow-up as well as between the epi-on and epi-off groups’ topographically thinnest point in the immediate post-surgery and 24 months after surgery were recorded. Conclusion: Our study highlighted that both techniques are valid in mid-term corneal stabilization. The advantage of the new iontophoresis epi-off cross-linking technique could be found in a faster imbibing time of the cornea, therefore reducing surgical times, with a lower risk of complications.
2022
Topographic Outcomes in Keratoconus Surgery: Epi-on versus Epi-off Iontophoresis Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking / Napolitano, Pasquale; Tranfa, Fausto; D'Andrea, Luca; Caruso, Ciro; Rinaldi, Michele; Mazzucco, Alberto; Ciampa, Nicola; Melenzane, Antonietta; Costagliola, Ciro. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 11:7(2022), p. 1785. [10.3390/jcm11071785]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
26. Topographic Outcomes in Keratoconus Surgery Epi-on versus Epi-off Iontophoresis Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 491.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
491.12 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/964497
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact