Background: Minimally Invasive thermal ablation (MITA) of liver tumors is a commonly performed procedure, alone or in combination with liver resection. Despite being a first-option strategy for small lesions, it is technically demanding, and many concerns still exist about local disease control. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing MITA from 1-2019 to 12-2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Risk factors of local recurrence were investigated through univariate and multivariable cox regression analysis. Results: At the multivariable analysis of the 207 nodules undergoing MITA, RFA was associated with worse local Recurrence Free Survival (lRFS) than MWA (HR 2.87 [95 % CI 0.96–8.66], p = 0.05), as well as a concomitant surgical resection (HR 3.89 [95 % CI 1.06–9.77], p = 0.02). A concomitant surgical resection showed worse lRFS in the subgroup analysis of both HCC (HR 3.98 [95 % CI 1.16–13.62], p = 0.02) and CRLM patients (HR 2.68 [95 % CI 0.66–5.92], p = 0.04). Interestingly, a tumor size between 30 and 40 mm was not associated to worse lRFS. Conclusion: MWA may reduce the risk of local recurrence in comparison to RFA, while MITA associated to liver resection may face an increased risk of local recurrence. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm such results.
Local recurrence risk factors and outcomes in minimally invasive thermal ablation for liver tumors: a single-institution analysis / Montalti, R.; Cassese, G.; Zidan, A.; Rompianesi, G.; Cesare Giglio, M.; Campanile, S.; Arena, L.; Maione, M.; Troisi, R.. - In: HPB. - ISSN 1365-182X. - (2024). [10.1016/j.hpb.2024.01.013]
Local recurrence risk factors and outcomes in minimally invasive thermal ablation for liver tumors: a single-institution analysis
Montalti R.;Cassese G.
;Rompianesi G.;Campanile S.;Arena L.;Maione M.;Troisi R.
2024
Abstract
Background: Minimally Invasive thermal ablation (MITA) of liver tumors is a commonly performed procedure, alone or in combination with liver resection. Despite being a first-option strategy for small lesions, it is technically demanding, and many concerns still exist about local disease control. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing MITA from 1-2019 to 12-2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Risk factors of local recurrence were investigated through univariate and multivariable cox regression analysis. Results: At the multivariable analysis of the 207 nodules undergoing MITA, RFA was associated with worse local Recurrence Free Survival (lRFS) than MWA (HR 2.87 [95 % CI 0.96–8.66], p = 0.05), as well as a concomitant surgical resection (HR 3.89 [95 % CI 1.06–9.77], p = 0.02). A concomitant surgical resection showed worse lRFS in the subgroup analysis of both HCC (HR 3.98 [95 % CI 1.16–13.62], p = 0.02) and CRLM patients (HR 2.68 [95 % CI 0.66–5.92], p = 0.04). Interestingly, a tumor size between 30 and 40 mm was not associated to worse lRFS. Conclusion: MWA may reduce the risk of local recurrence in comparison to RFA, while MITA associated to liver resection may face an increased risk of local recurrence. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm such results.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
MITA.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
244.44 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
244.44 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.