We propose a new criticism of Frank Hahn’s attempt to prove that the surplus approach constitutes no more than a ‘special case’ of the neoclassical model of intertemporal general equilibrium. In particular, we show that Hahn’s ‘special case’ is vitiated by the paradox of determining the past as a function of the future. In order to make the communication between schools of thought easier, we present our criticism of Hahn within a mathematical framework drawn from the well-known Solow growth model.
On the Impossibility of Reducing the Surplus Approach to a Neo-Classical Special Case. A criticism of Hahn in a ”Solowian” context / Brancaccio, E. - In: REVIEW OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. - ISSN 0953-8259. - 22:3(2010), pp. 405-418. [10.1080/09538259.2010.491288]
On the Impossibility of Reducing the Surplus Approach to a Neo-Classical Special Case. A criticism of Hahn in a ”Solowian” context
BRANCACCIO E
2010
Abstract
We propose a new criticism of Frank Hahn’s attempt to prove that the surplus approach constitutes no more than a ‘special case’ of the neoclassical model of intertemporal general equilibrium. In particular, we show that Hahn’s ‘special case’ is vitiated by the paradox of determining the past as a function of the future. In order to make the communication between schools of thought easier, we present our criticism of Hahn within a mathematical framework drawn from the well-known Solow growth model.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Brancaccio ROPE 2010.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
92.76 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
92.76 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.