Background: We evaluated the safety and feasibility of one-lung ventilation in obese patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy and whether obesity affected peri- and postoperative outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective single center study including consecutive patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy between October 2019 and February 2022. Obese patients were statistically compared to a control group to evaluate any differences in relation to one-lung ventilation and peri- and postoperative outcomes. Results: Our study population included 111 patients; of these, 26 (23%) were included in the obese group, while 85 (77%) were included within the nonobese group. To obtain one-lung ventilation in nonobese patients, a double-lumen tube was more frequently used than a single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker (61% vs. 39%; p = 0.02), while in obese patients a single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker was used more than a double-lumen tube (81% vs. 19%, p = 0.001). Intergroup comparison showed that a double-lumen tube was the preferred method in nonobese patients, while a single-lumen tube with bronchial blockers was the strategy of choice in obese patients (p = 0.0002). Intubation time was longer in the obese group than in the nonobese group (94.0 ± 6.1 vs. 85.0 ± 7.0 s; p = 0.0004) and failure rate of first attempt at intubation was higher in the obese group (23% vs. 5%; p = 0.01). Obesity was not associated with increased intra-, peri- and postoperative complications and/or mortality. Conclusions: One-lung ventilation is a feasible and safe procedure also in obese patients and obesity did not negatively affect peri- and postoperative outcomes after lung resection.
One-lung ventilation in obese patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer / Leonardi, B.; Forte, S.; Natale, G.; Messina, G.; Rainone, A.; Opromolla, G.; Puca, M. A.; Grande, M.; Martone, M.; Leone, F.; Fiorito, R.; Molino, F.; Liguori, G.; Russo, F.; Ferraro, F.; Pace, M. C.; Molino, A.; Ferrante, L.; Forte, M.; Vicidomini, G.; Fiorelli, A.. - In: THORACIC CANCER. - ISSN 1759-7706. - 14:3(2023), pp. 281-288. [10.1111/1759-7714.14747]
One-lung ventilation in obese patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer
Forte S.;Rainone A.;Fiorito R.;Molino F.;Molino A.;Vicidomini G.;
2023
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the safety and feasibility of one-lung ventilation in obese patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy and whether obesity affected peri- and postoperative outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective single center study including consecutive patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy between October 2019 and February 2022. Obese patients were statistically compared to a control group to evaluate any differences in relation to one-lung ventilation and peri- and postoperative outcomes. Results: Our study population included 111 patients; of these, 26 (23%) were included in the obese group, while 85 (77%) were included within the nonobese group. To obtain one-lung ventilation in nonobese patients, a double-lumen tube was more frequently used than a single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker (61% vs. 39%; p = 0.02), while in obese patients a single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker was used more than a double-lumen tube (81% vs. 19%, p = 0.001). Intergroup comparison showed that a double-lumen tube was the preferred method in nonobese patients, while a single-lumen tube with bronchial blockers was the strategy of choice in obese patients (p = 0.0002). Intubation time was longer in the obese group than in the nonobese group (94.0 ± 6.1 vs. 85.0 ± 7.0 s; p = 0.0004) and failure rate of first attempt at intubation was higher in the obese group (23% vs. 5%; p = 0.01). Obesity was not associated with increased intra-, peri- and postoperative complications and/or mortality. Conclusions: One-lung ventilation is a feasible and safe procedure also in obese patients and obesity did not negatively affect peri- and postoperative outcomes after lung resection.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


