(1) Background: Gait analysis provides quantitative information on walking patterns and has proven invaluable for assessing motor function in rehabilitation programmes. A mark erless motion capture system combining computer vision techniques provides low-cost, real-time, portable gait analysis. (2) Methods: The kinematics of the knee and ankle of twenty-seven healthy volunteers were assessed using a single smartphone camera com bined with the MediaPipe human pose estimation framework. The system was validated using the OPAL wearable sensor system by APDM Wearable Technologies. (3) Results: Findings showed close correspondence between the two systems for knee kinematics show ing a mean absolute error of 4.10° ± 2.32° and 3.15° ± 3.10° for right and left knee flexion, respectively, and a mean absolute error of 2.30° ± 2.01° and 3.12° ± 2.63° for right and left knee extension, respectively. The mean absolute error for right and left knee range of mo tion was found to be 4.55° ± 3.12° and 4.15° ± 3.01°, respectively. Moreover, Bland–Altman plots indicated minimal bias (average 0.6 for flexion, average 0.47 for the extension, and 0.30 for the range of motion) and excellent correlation for knee flexion bilaterally (0.916 and 0.845 for the right and left side, respectively), with slightly lower but still satisfactory agreement for knee extension (0.862 and 0.845 for the right and left side, respectively). Conversely, ankle measurements revealed poor concordance: dorsiflexion and range of motionpresented significant differences and systematic errors, while plantarflexion showed no statistical difference but weak correlation. (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrated that combining a smartphone camera with a human pose estimation framework allows for Academic Editors: Kenneth Loh and Manuel E. Hernandez Received: 12 January 2026 Revised: 27 February 2026 Accepted: 27 March 2026 Published: 31 March 2026 Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. low-cost, real-time, portable gait analysis, particularly of the knee joint.
Estimation of the Knee Joint with Single-Camera Smartphone / Russo, Michela; Ricciardi, Carlo; Romano, Maria; Santoriello, Vittorio; Ponsiglione, Alfonso Maria; Amato, Francesco; Spadea, Maria Francesca. - In: SENSORS. - ISSN 1424-8220. - 26:7(2026), pp. 1-18. [10.3390/s26072148]
Estimation of the Knee Joint with Single-Camera Smartphone
Russo, Michela;Ricciardi, Carlo;Romano, Maria;Santoriello, Vittorio;Ponsiglione, Alfonso Maria;Amato, Francesco;
2026
Abstract
(1) Background: Gait analysis provides quantitative information on walking patterns and has proven invaluable for assessing motor function in rehabilitation programmes. A mark erless motion capture system combining computer vision techniques provides low-cost, real-time, portable gait analysis. (2) Methods: The kinematics of the knee and ankle of twenty-seven healthy volunteers were assessed using a single smartphone camera com bined with the MediaPipe human pose estimation framework. The system was validated using the OPAL wearable sensor system by APDM Wearable Technologies. (3) Results: Findings showed close correspondence between the two systems for knee kinematics show ing a mean absolute error of 4.10° ± 2.32° and 3.15° ± 3.10° for right and left knee flexion, respectively, and a mean absolute error of 2.30° ± 2.01° and 3.12° ± 2.63° for right and left knee extension, respectively. The mean absolute error for right and left knee range of mo tion was found to be 4.55° ± 3.12° and 4.15° ± 3.01°, respectively. Moreover, Bland–Altman plots indicated minimal bias (average 0.6 for flexion, average 0.47 for the extension, and 0.30 for the range of motion) and excellent correlation for knee flexion bilaterally (0.916 and 0.845 for the right and left side, respectively), with slightly lower but still satisfactory agreement for knee extension (0.862 and 0.845 for the right and left side, respectively). Conversely, ankle measurements revealed poor concordance: dorsiflexion and range of motionpresented significant differences and systematic errors, while plantarflexion showed no statistical difference but weak correlation. (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrated that combining a smartphone camera with a human pose estimation framework allows for Academic Editors: Kenneth Loh and Manuel E. Hernandez Received: 12 January 2026 Revised: 27 February 2026 Accepted: 27 March 2026 Published: 31 March 2026 Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. low-cost, real-time, portable gait analysis, particularly of the knee joint.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
sensors- stampa -26-02148.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
8.14 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
8.14 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


