This paper aims to provide some guidelines in the aerodynamic design and optimization of future regional turboprop aircraft with about 90 passengers. Currently there are no configurations on the market of this type, thus a typical 70 passengers turboprop aircraft is taken as reference starting point. The most critical aircraft components in terms of aerodynamic drag contribution and possible improvement are highlighted and an automatic procedure manageable trough MATLab® is described. This interfacing procedure allows importing and modifying geometries using interpolating curves and surfaces via NURBS. Within the optimization loop, any new geometry is analyzed trough the panel code solver until optimized shapes are found. Wing–fuselage junction (also called “Karman”), undercarriage pod, fuselage nose and wing-tip device have been investigated and estimation of performance advantages has been computed. Design of the winglet is presented highlighting performance improvements during the entire mission profile. Finally two different turboprop configurations are proposed: the first with a 4-abreast fuselage arrangement and the second with 5-abreast, highlighting pros and cons of each configuration.
Aerodynamic guidelines in the design and optimization of new regional turboprop aircraft / DELLA VECCHIA, Pierluigi; Nicolosi, Fabrizio. - In: AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 1270-9638. - 38:(2014), pp. 88-104. [10.1016/j.ast.2014.07.018]
Aerodynamic guidelines in the design and optimization of new regional turboprop aircraft
DELLA VECCHIA, PIERLUIGI;NICOLOSI, FABRIZIO
2014
Abstract
This paper aims to provide some guidelines in the aerodynamic design and optimization of future regional turboprop aircraft with about 90 passengers. Currently there are no configurations on the market of this type, thus a typical 70 passengers turboprop aircraft is taken as reference starting point. The most critical aircraft components in terms of aerodynamic drag contribution and possible improvement are highlighted and an automatic procedure manageable trough MATLab® is described. This interfacing procedure allows importing and modifying geometries using interpolating curves and surfaces via NURBS. Within the optimization loop, any new geometry is analyzed trough the panel code solver until optimized shapes are found. Wing–fuselage junction (also called “Karman”), undercarriage pod, fuselage nose and wing-tip device have been investigated and estimation of performance advantages has been computed. Design of the winglet is presented highlighting performance improvements during the entire mission profile. Finally two different turboprop configurations are proposed: the first with a 4-abreast fuselage arrangement and the second with 5-abreast, highlighting pros and cons of each configuration.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Prima pagina ASCTE 38 2014.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Abstract
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
122.73 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
122.73 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
ASCTE 38 2014.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Articolo reperibile su rivista Elsevier
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
5.28 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
5.28 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.