Purpose: Posterior fossa ependymoma comprises two distinct molecular variants termed EPN-PFA and EPN-PFB that have a distinct biology and natural history. The therapeutic value of cytoreductive surgery and radiation therapy for posterior fossa ependymoma after accounting for molecular subgroup is not known. Methods: Four independent nonoverlapping retrospective cohorts of posterior fossa ependymomas (n = 820) were profiled using genome-wide methylation arrays. Risk stratification models were designed based on known clinical and newly described molecular biomarkers identified by multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: Molecular subgroup is a powerful independent predictor of outcome even when accounting for age or treatment regimen. Incompletely resected EPN-PFA ependymomas have a dismal prognosis, with a 5-year progression-free survival ranging from 26.1% to 56.8% across all four cohorts. Although first-line (adjuvant) radiation is clearly beneficial for completely resected EPN-PFA, a substantial proportion of patients with EPN-PFB can be cured with surgery alone, and patients with relapsed EPN-PFB can often be treated successfully with delayed external-beam irradiation. Conclusion: The most impactful biomarker for posterior fossa ependymoma is molecular subgroup affiliation, independent of other demographic or treatment variables. However, both EPN-PFA and EPN-PFB still benefit from increased extent of resection, with the survival rates being particularly poor for subtotally resected EPN-PFA, even with adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients with EPN-PFB who undergo gross total resection are at lower risk for relapse and should be considered for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of observation alone with radiation reserved for those who experience recurrence.
Therapeutic impact of cytoreductive surgery and irradiation of posterior fossa ependymoma in the molecular era: A retrospective multicohort analysis / Ramaswamy, V; Hielscher, T; Mack, Sc; Lassaletta, A; Lin, T; Pajtler, Kw; Jones, Dt; Luu, B; Cavalli, Fm; Aldape, K; Remke, M; Mynarek, M; Rutkowski, S; Gururangan, S; Mclendon, Re; Lipp, Es; Dunham, C; Hukin, J; Eisenstat, Dd; Fulton, D; van Landeghem, Fk; Santi, M; van Veelen, Ml; Van Meir, Eg; Osuka, S; Fan, X; Muraszko, Km; Tirapelli, Dp; Oba Shinjo, Sm; Marie, Sk; Carlotti, Cg; Lee, Jy; Rao, Aa; Giannini, C; Faria, Cc; Nunes, S; Mora, J; Hamilton, Rl; Hauser, P; Jabado, N; Petrecca, K; Jung, S; Massimi, L; Zollo, Massimo; Cinalli, G; Bognár, L; Klekner, A; Hortobágyi, T; Leary, S; Ermoian, Rp; Olson, Jm; Leonard, Jr; Gardner, C; Grajkowska, Wa; Chambless, Lb; Cain, J; Eberhart, Cg; Ahsan, S; Massimino, M; Giangaspero, F; Buttarelli, Fr; Packer, Rj; Emery, L; Yong, Wh; Soto, H; Liau, Lm; Everson, R; Grossbach, A; Shalaby, T; Grotzer, M; Karajannis, Ma; Zagzag, D; Wheeler, H; von Hoff, K; Alonso, Mm; Tuñon, T; Schüller, U; Zitterbart, K; Sterba, J; Chan, Ja; Guzman, M; Elbabaa, Sk; Colman, H; Dhall, G; Fisher, Pg; Fouladi, M; Gajjar, A; Goldman, S; Hwang, E; Kool, M; Ladha, H; Vera Bolanos, E; Wani, K; Lieberman, F; Mikkelsen, T; Omuro, Am; Pollack, If; Prados, M; Robins, Hi; Soffietti, R; Wu, J; Metellus, P; Tabori, U; Bartels, U; Bouffet, E; Hawkins, Ce; Rutka, Jt; Dirks, P; Pfister, Sm; Merchant, Te; Gilbert, Mr; Armstrong, Ts; Korshunov, A; Ellison, Dw; Taylor, M. d.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - 34:21(2016), pp. 2468-2477. [10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7825]
Therapeutic impact of cytoreductive surgery and irradiation of posterior fossa ependymoma in the molecular era: A retrospective multicohort analysis
ZOLLO, MASSIMO;
2016
Abstract
Purpose: Posterior fossa ependymoma comprises two distinct molecular variants termed EPN-PFA and EPN-PFB that have a distinct biology and natural history. The therapeutic value of cytoreductive surgery and radiation therapy for posterior fossa ependymoma after accounting for molecular subgroup is not known. Methods: Four independent nonoverlapping retrospective cohorts of posterior fossa ependymomas (n = 820) were profiled using genome-wide methylation arrays. Risk stratification models were designed based on known clinical and newly described molecular biomarkers identified by multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: Molecular subgroup is a powerful independent predictor of outcome even when accounting for age or treatment regimen. Incompletely resected EPN-PFA ependymomas have a dismal prognosis, with a 5-year progression-free survival ranging from 26.1% to 56.8% across all four cohorts. Although first-line (adjuvant) radiation is clearly beneficial for completely resected EPN-PFA, a substantial proportion of patients with EPN-PFB can be cured with surgery alone, and patients with relapsed EPN-PFB can often be treated successfully with delayed external-beam irradiation. Conclusion: The most impactful biomarker for posterior fossa ependymoma is molecular subgroup affiliation, independent of other demographic or treatment variables. However, both EPN-PFA and EPN-PFB still benefit from increased extent of resection, with the survival rates being particularly poor for subtotally resected EPN-PFA, even with adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients with EPN-PFB who undergo gross total resection are at lower risk for relapse and should be considered for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of observation alone with radiation reserved for those who experience recurrence.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2468.full.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: pdf
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.41 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.41 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.