We study the effect of a reduction in employment protection on workers’ fertility decisions. Using data from the Italian Labor Force Survey for 2013-2018, we analyze how the propensity to have a child has been affected by the 2015 labor market reform dubbed the “Jobs Act,” which reduced employment protection for employees of larger firms while leaving small firms essentially untouched. We take a Difference-in-Differences identification approach and compare the change in fertility decisions of women employed in large firms with that of women in small firms. We find that the former’s probability of having a child is 1.4 percentage points lower. A battery of robustness checks confirms this finding. The effect also holds when possible sorting issues are accounted for by an instrumental variable approach. We document substantial heterogeneous effects by age, marital status, parity, and geographical area as well as by education and earnings. Our findings suggest the potential unintended consequences on fertility that labor market reforms introducing greater flexibility may have by heightening career insecurity.
Employment protection and fertility decisions: The unintended consequences of the Italian Jobs Act / DE PAOLA, Maria; Nistico', Roberto; Scoppa, Vincenzo. - In: ECONOMIC POLICY. - ISSN 1468-0327. - 36:108(2021), pp. 735-773. [10.1093/epolic/eiab015]
Employment protection and fertility decisions: The unintended consequences of the Italian Jobs Act
Maria De Paola;Roberto Nistico'
;Vincenzo Scoppa
2021
Abstract
We study the effect of a reduction in employment protection on workers’ fertility decisions. Using data from the Italian Labor Force Survey for 2013-2018, we analyze how the propensity to have a child has been affected by the 2015 labor market reform dubbed the “Jobs Act,” which reduced employment protection for employees of larger firms while leaving small firms essentially untouched. We take a Difference-in-Differences identification approach and compare the change in fertility decisions of women employed in large firms with that of women in small firms. We find that the former’s probability of having a child is 1.4 percentage points lower. A battery of robustness checks confirms this finding. The effect also holds when possible sorting issues are accounted for by an instrumental variable approach. We document substantial heterogeneous effects by age, marital status, parity, and geographical area as well as by education and earnings. Our findings suggest the potential unintended consequences on fertility that labor market reforms introducing greater flexibility may have by heightening career insecurity.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.