Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may help patients and clinicians in selecting disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: To evaluate PRO differences among first-line DMTs for relapsing-remitting (RR) people with MS (pwMS). Methods: Multicenter study. RR pwMS on first-line DMTs completed Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), PROs Indices for MS (PRIMUS), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Differences among PROs across DMTs were tested by ANOVA. Multivariable linear regressions were used to investigate associations between PROs and the treatment group. Results: Two-hundred eighty pwMS were enrolled: 56% were on interferons (INF), 22% on dimethylfumarate (DMF), 13% on glatiramer acetate, and 9% on teriflunomide (Teri). Compared with INF, pwMS on Teri were the oldest, with higher disability, worst depression at BDI, worst cognitive performances at SDMT (p = 0.001), fatigue at FSS (p = 0.001), and activity limitation and quality of life respectively at PRIMUS (p = 0.005) and SF-36 Mental Composite Score (p < 0.001); pwMS on DMF reported highest side effects and, together with pwMS on Teri, better treatment satisfaction at TSQM. Conclusions: Compared with INF-treated patients, pwMS on DMF and Teri reported the best treatment satisfaction, although DMF-treated pwMS reported higher side effects and those on Teri the worst QoL and fatigue; however, the older age, higher disability and depression, and worse cognitive performance of pwMS on Teri suggest to be careful in evaluating these results.

A snapshot on patient-reported outcome measures of people with multiple sclerosis on first-line therapies in a real world setting / Lanzillo, R.; Sparaco, M.; Lavorgna, L.; Carmisciano, L.; Signoriello, E.; Signori, A.; Costabile, T.; Maniscalco, G. T.; Sacca, F.; Cepparulo, S.; Russo, C. V.; Bisecco, A.; Frattaruolo, N.; Strianese, A.; Lus, G.; Brescia Morra, V.; Bonavita, S.. - In: NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 1590-1874. - (2020). [10.1007/s10072-020-04367-9]

A snapshot on patient-reported outcome measures of people with multiple sclerosis on first-line therapies in a real world setting

Lanzillo R.;Costabile T.;Sacca F.;Russo C. V.;Brescia Morra V.;
2020

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may help patients and clinicians in selecting disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: To evaluate PRO differences among first-line DMTs for relapsing-remitting (RR) people with MS (pwMS). Methods: Multicenter study. RR pwMS on first-line DMTs completed Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), PROs Indices for MS (PRIMUS), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Differences among PROs across DMTs were tested by ANOVA. Multivariable linear regressions were used to investigate associations between PROs and the treatment group. Results: Two-hundred eighty pwMS were enrolled: 56% were on interferons (INF), 22% on dimethylfumarate (DMF), 13% on glatiramer acetate, and 9% on teriflunomide (Teri). Compared with INF, pwMS on Teri were the oldest, with higher disability, worst depression at BDI, worst cognitive performances at SDMT (p = 0.001), fatigue at FSS (p = 0.001), and activity limitation and quality of life respectively at PRIMUS (p = 0.005) and SF-36 Mental Composite Score (p < 0.001); pwMS on DMF reported highest side effects and, together with pwMS on Teri, better treatment satisfaction at TSQM. Conclusions: Compared with INF-treated patients, pwMS on DMF and Teri reported the best treatment satisfaction, although DMF-treated pwMS reported higher side effects and those on Teri the worst QoL and fatigue; however, the older age, higher disability and depression, and worse cognitive performance of pwMS on Teri suggest to be careful in evaluating these results.
2020
A snapshot on patient-reported outcome measures of people with multiple sclerosis on first-line therapies in a real world setting / Lanzillo, R.; Sparaco, M.; Lavorgna, L.; Carmisciano, L.; Signoriello, E.; Signori, A.; Costabile, T.; Maniscalco, G. T.; Sacca, F.; Cepparulo, S.; Russo, C. V.; Bisecco, A.; Frattaruolo, N.; Strianese, A.; Lus, G.; Brescia Morra, V.; Bonavita, S.. - In: NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 1590-1874. - (2020). [10.1007/s10072-020-04367-9]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/812104
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact