We focus on the Internet constitutional rules linked with the algorithmic decision-making. The reasoning is structured upon two related topics. Firstly, the regulatory model well tailored to the Internet: hard or soft law. Secondly, the constitutional legitimacy arising from each model: at the national and European levels. The algorithms are assumed as test for the resistance or not of the binomial category: fundamental rights/public power. They pose the challenge to design new reasonable paradigms able to take into account the visibility and the intelligibility of algorithms. The Author leaves us with a basic question: a rule suited to draw an “algorithm Constitutional by design”.
Towards an “algorithm constitutional by design” / Minico, De. - In: BIOLAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 2284-4503. - 1(2021), pp. 381-403.
Towards an “algorithm constitutional by design”.
De Minico
2021
Abstract
We focus on the Internet constitutional rules linked with the algorithmic decision-making. The reasoning is structured upon two related topics. Firstly, the regulatory model well tailored to the Internet: hard or soft law. Secondly, the constitutional legitimacy arising from each model: at the national and European levels. The algorithms are assumed as test for the resistance or not of the binomial category: fundamental rights/public power. They pose the challenge to design new reasonable paradigms able to take into account the visibility and the intelligibility of algorithms. The Author leaves us with a basic question: a rule suited to draw an “algorithm Constitutional by design”.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Towards an algorithm constitutional by design.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
314.67 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
314.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.