Even if previous studies investigated seismic fragility of existing bridges, some recent collapse cases set the need to investigate their vulnerability under gravity loads. In this study, the class of simply supported, beam-type, prestressed concrete bridges built between 1970 and 1980 was considered to carry out a fragility analysis of the most recurrent type of Italian bridges to traffic loads. Based on the literature and new data collected by the authors from real bridges, geometric, material and load variables were defined through probability distributions and regression models. Then, a code-based capacity modelling of bridge decks was carried out, followed by the implementation of a simplified deck analysis method that allows extensive simulations. In a first step, a sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the random variables that mostly affect the structural response, to be taken into account in the fragility analysis for the ultimate limit state. Then, a fragility analysis was carried through a fully automatic procedure implemented in MATLAB. The main output consists of fragility models that might be used by engineers, roadway management companies and decision-makers in large-scale risk assessments of existing highway bridges under code-based traffic loads, as a basis for prioritization of more refined performance evaluations and structural retrofitting programmes.

Traffic-load fragility models for prestressed concrete girder decks of existing Italian highway bridges / Miluccio, G.; Losanno, D.; Parisi, F.; Cosenza, E.. - In: ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. - ISSN 0141-0296. - 249:(2021), p. 113367. [10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113367]

Traffic-load fragility models for prestressed concrete girder decks of existing Italian highway bridges

Miluccio G.
Primo
Software
;
Losanno D.
Secondo
Investigation
;
Parisi F.
Penultimo
Methodology
;
Cosenza E.
Ultimo
Supervision
2021

Abstract

Even if previous studies investigated seismic fragility of existing bridges, some recent collapse cases set the need to investigate their vulnerability under gravity loads. In this study, the class of simply supported, beam-type, prestressed concrete bridges built between 1970 and 1980 was considered to carry out a fragility analysis of the most recurrent type of Italian bridges to traffic loads. Based on the literature and new data collected by the authors from real bridges, geometric, material and load variables were defined through probability distributions and regression models. Then, a code-based capacity modelling of bridge decks was carried out, followed by the implementation of a simplified deck analysis method that allows extensive simulations. In a first step, a sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the random variables that mostly affect the structural response, to be taken into account in the fragility analysis for the ultimate limit state. Then, a fragility analysis was carried through a fully automatic procedure implemented in MATLAB. The main output consists of fragility models that might be used by engineers, roadway management companies and decision-makers in large-scale risk assessments of existing highway bridges under code-based traffic loads, as a basis for prioritization of more refined performance evaluations and structural retrofitting programmes.
2021
Traffic-load fragility models for prestressed concrete girder decks of existing Italian highway bridges / Miluccio, G.; Losanno, D.; Parisi, F.; Cosenza, E.. - In: ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. - ISSN 0141-0296. - 249:(2021), p. 113367. [10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113367]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0141029621014796-main_Miluccio et al_ES.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.67 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.67 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/864930
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 48
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact