The paper puts forward a fundamental question: which rules for ChatGPT? It starts with an examination of the state of the art, which oscillates between the zero rules of the Digital Services Act and the over-regulation of the Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence. The Parliament’s amendments to the proposal (May 11th 2023) intervene on some issues: they transform the solitary and quasi-objective accountability of the provider into the chain of accountability between the former and the developer. But grey areas remain in the absence of prior control over the fake information generated by our Chat. The Author concludes by steering the regulatory regime to the goal of combining fundamental freedoms with technical innovation.
Too many rules or zero rules for the ChatGPT? / De Minico, G.. - In: BIOLAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 2284-4503. - 2(2023), pp. 491-501. [10.15168/2284-4503-2723]
Too many rules or zero rules for the ChatGPT?
De Minico G.
2023
Abstract
The paper puts forward a fundamental question: which rules for ChatGPT? It starts with an examination of the state of the art, which oscillates between the zero rules of the Digital Services Act and the over-regulation of the Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence. The Parliament’s amendments to the proposal (May 11th 2023) intervene on some issues: they transform the solitary and quasi-objective accountability of the provider into the chain of accountability between the former and the developer. But grey areas remain in the absence of prior control over the fake information generated by our Chat. The Author concludes by steering the regulatory regime to the goal of combining fundamental freedoms with technical innovation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
25+De+Minico (3).pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
310.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
310.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.